Johnny Neat
Member since: May 25th, 2007
Johnny Neat's Latest Comments
Blog Activity
| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Autoblog | 3 Comments |
| Joystiq | 241 Comments |
| Engadget | 9 Comments |
| Engadget HD | 34 Comments |
| Joystiq Xbox | 3 Comments |
| Engadget Mobile | 2 Comments |


Xbox Live's Deal of the Week is all about the Batman, his boy wonder
Feb 16th 2012 10:08AM (Joystiq)Report: GameStop outs Arkham City DLC dates, prices
Oct 12th 2011 9:30AM (Joystiq)The beta and Battlefield 3
Oct 11th 2011 3:53PM (Joystiq)The beta and Battlefield 3
Oct 11th 2011 8:56AM (Joystiq)The beta and Battlefield 3
Oct 11th 2011 8:54AM (Joystiq)Now with all that said, all they could test in my opinion was how people play (especially exploits) and testing the network. Other than those things, this supposedly old code couldn't test much of anything as it's an old code. Why waste time on an old code, to test problems already fixed? I doubt it if that's the truth. No they had to at the very least jump a legal hurdle and by proxy test code?
I have doubts as most of my friends who's I've tried selling this game to over Call of Duty's same old same old cocky bullshit of a game and philosophy. Now I'm not saying we won't get MW3, because that would be a lie, but I had hoped to convince them to try a more mature and challenging first person shooter. Sadly this was made even harder by this beta and our experiences with the let down that was Medal of Honor and without any connection past same genre, Homefront.
I think most if not all of the people I know are going to rent Battlefield 3 day one before making a final choice on this matter. I know I'm keeping my preorder, but I'm still going to rent day one to see if I keep it or return it and see how it goes down the road with patches and updates if I feel that's even a consideration or a necessity.
Fingers until then are crossed hoping for the ultimate best results.
P.s. Despite this article or write up whatever, I and too many of us hope hardcore is hardcore in BF3. Pumping a clip into an enemy player isn't fun and anyone who says it is isn't looking for realism and or immersion but a second chance to compensate for slow reaction speeds from the down syndrome they are living through or the puff puff high they do on a regular. Just saying.
Spencer: Microsoft once considered Crytek for 1st party development
Jul 6th 2011 3:44PM (Joystiq)Rumor: Black Rock never had a chance with Disney, employees say
Jul 6th 2011 3:42PM (Joystiq)Former Kaos Studios boss becomes senior creative director at Ubisoft Red Storm
Jun 28th 2011 1:49PM (Joystiq)Playable Catwoman unmasked in Batman: Arkham City
Jun 1st 2011 5:25PM (Joystiq)The Modern Warfare 3 leak, from Activision's perspective
May 29th 2011 3:40PM (Joystiq)Enough is enough, I'm glad it all got leaked. Fire in the hole bitches, get your game right and start treating gamers with a little more interest past our money.
Now my main complaint is on how little CoD changes. I don't need a strange departure from sequel to sequel, but come on this copy pasting of code with a new visuals has been going on for a bit too long is just wrong.
I'm annoyed as well with the absence of any beta being offered, especially after how totally unbalanced and glitchy MW2 was. We know why it was, but that doesn't make it better for all of us who bought then suffered through it all.
And look, I want to know more on Multiplayer, not a 4-5 hour campaign. Leave that a secret, give us the nitty gritty already. Sheesh.
Battlefield has the upper hand and they know it, so why the repeat performance from the last outing which they claim they need to improve from?