<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Joystiq</title>
<link>http://www.joystiq.com</link>
<description>Joystiq</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Scratch: The Ultimate DJ drama continues as 7 Studios countersues]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/24/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-drama-continues-as-7-studios-countersue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/24/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-drama-continues-as-7-studios-countersue/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/24/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-drama-continues-as-7-studios-countersue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2009/04/7-studios-countersues-says-genius-committed-the-fraud.html"><img vspace="0" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/catfight_580px.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
The tangled web of developers, publishers and the various lawsuits between them, has just gotten that much more complex as <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/7-studios">7 Studios</a> countersues <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/scratch-the-ultimate-dj/"><em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em></a> publishers <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/genius-products">Genius Products</a>. According to court documents obtained by <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2009/04/7-studios-countersues-says-genius-committed-the-fraud.html">The Cut Scene blog</a>, 7 Studios is asking for $1 million in damages, allegedly attributed to a variety of "unlawful and unsavory business practices." <br /><br />Among them, 7 Studios alleges Genius Products repeatedly delayed production of the game, didn't deliver various assets on time (music, that is), considered creating a Nintendo Wii version of the game (then subsequently canceled it), and when things didn't work out, tried to cut and run. In so many words, 7 Studios is accusing Genius of asking them to create a game without adequate support and then, when the game was nearly finished, trying to shop it out to other publishers. We've reached out to all parties involved (repeatedly) and, like the Cut Scene blog, heard nothing back. We'll update this post accordingly if we hear anything, but at this point, we're suggesting that you don't hold your breath.<br /><br />
<div align="right">[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/play4smee/2559942343/sizes/o/">Image</a>]<br /></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/24/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-drama-continues-as-7-studios-countersue/">Scratch: The Ultimate DJ drama continues as 7 Studios countersues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2009/04/7-studios-countersues-says-genius-committed-the-fraud.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/24/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-drama-continues-as-7-studios-countersue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1527305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/24/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-drama-continues-as-7-studios-countersue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>activision</category><category>breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo</category><category>countersuit</category><category>cut-scene</category><category>genius-products</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>numark</category><category>scratch-the-ultimate-dj</category><category>variety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scratch: The Ultimate DJ granted restraining order]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/20/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-granted-restraining-order/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/20/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-granted-restraining-order/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/20/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-granted-restraining-order/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/tmpphpy2hrky.jpg" /></div>
In the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo/">ongoing court battle</a> between <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em> co-publishers <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/genius-products">Genius Products</a> and <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/numark">Numark</a> vs. <em>DJ Hero</em> publisher <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/activision">Activision</a>, the first of many legal battles has been detailed. According to a press release sent out by Genius Products, the Los Angeles Superior Court has granted the <em>Scratch</em> developers a temporary restraining order and told Activision-owned <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/7-studios">7 Studios</a> to return all source code. <br /><br />Additionally, 7 Studios is being court-ordered to return "pre-existing developer tools and technology" used in the game's 18-month development cycle, presumably including the "nine custom-manufactured turntable and beat-button game controllers" claimed by Numark as being held hostage by 7 Studios and, in turn, Activision. Outside of returning all the equipment used in the development of Scratch, 7 Studios' CEO, Lewis Peterson, has been effectively banned from any involvement with the game and the former Scratch team has been ordered not to speak about its development. This news clashes directly with <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/">allegations put forth by Activision</a> last week, positing that the Los Angeles Superior Court had denied said restraining order. We've put in a request for comment to Activision and will update this post as we find out more.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/20/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-granted-restraining-order/">Scratch: The Ultimate DJ granted restraining order</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/20/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-granted-restraining-order/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1522865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/20/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-granted-restraining-order/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>activision</category><category>breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo</category><category>business</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>legal</category><category>lewis-peterson</category><category>numark</category><category>restraining-order</category><category>scratch-the-ultimate-dj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The sordid history of Scratch: The Ultimate DJ]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/17/the-sordid-history-of-scratch-the-ultimate-dj/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/17/the-sordid-history-of-scratch-the-ultimate-dj/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/17/the-sordid-history-of-scratch-the-ultimate-dj/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2009/04/scr.html"><img vspace="0" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/scratchtheultdj580px.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
In the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo/">pending lawsuit</a> between <em>DJ Hero</em> publisher <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/activision">Activision</a> and <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em> co-publishers Genius Products and Numark, all we've heard are each sides' <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/">allegations</a> and <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/">condemnations</a> of the other. What we haven't heard, however, was the long and messy tale leading up to the current state of things between former <em>Scratch</em> developer <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/7-studios">7 Studios</a> (now owned by Activision), Genius Products and, apparently, Brash Entertainment. Yes -- <em>that</em> <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/12/02/brash-goes-out-with-a-fascinating-bang/">Brash Entertainment</a>.<br /><br />According to <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2009/04/scr.html">The Cut Scene</a>, <em>Scratch</em> began development in 2007, allegedly by 7 Studios and Brash Entertainment. In summer of the same year, Brash decided to focus on licensed properties and sold off the IP to Genius Products. The piece further alleges that by late last year, Genius Products was having financial problems and was not so much being courted by major publishers (including MTV, EA, Ubisoft and, yes, Activision) as it was trying to sell off a seemingly <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_asset">toxic asset</a>. If The Cut Scene's anonymous sources are to be believed, there's a lot more going on here than it would seem.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/17/the-sordid-history-of-scratch-the-ultimate-dj/">The sordid history of Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2009/04/scr.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/17/the-sordid-history-of-scratch-the-ultimate-dj/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1520056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/17/the-sordid-history-of-scratch-the-ultimate-dj/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>activision</category><category>brash-entertainment</category><category>breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo</category><category>business</category><category>ea</category><category>Electronic-Arts</category><category>genius-products</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>mtv</category><category>numark</category><category>scratch-the-ultimate-dj</category><category>ubisoft</category><category>variety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Activision responds to Scratch lawsuit, court denies restraining order]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://investor.activision.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=377769"><img vspace="0" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/david_goliath_580px.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Moving into day three of <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo/">Breakin' (the law) 2: Electric Boogaloo</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/activision">Activision</a> has fired back at <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em> LLC (<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/numark">Numark</a> and <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/genius-products">Genius Products</a>' joint business venture). It says allegations made in <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/">the lawsuit</a> "are disingenuous and lack any merit," and backs up that statement with the Los Angeles Superior Court's decision not to grant a restraining order against the mega-publisher. <br /><br />Furthermore, Activision claims that Genius Products is scapegoating the publisher, explicitly stating, "These allegations are nothing more than an attempt by Genius [Products] to place blame for the game's delays, as well as to divert attention from the cash flow, liquidity and revenue challenges Genius detailed in its Mar. 30 <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1098016/000101968709001086/0001019687-09-001086-index.idea.htm">SEC filing</a>." <br /><br />The press release makes no mention of the "nine custom-manufactured turntable and beat-button game controllers" allegedly belonging to Numark nor the current state of development of <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em>, presumably still being held by Activision-owned <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/7-studios">7 Studios</a>. It does, however, tell us that the lawsuit will have "no effect" on the development of Activision's own DJ-based rhythm game, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/dj-hero"><em>DJ Hero</em></a>. We've asked Activision for its official side of the story and will update this post accordingly as news develops.<br /><br /><strong>Update:</strong> Activision has responded to our request for comment with, "Unfortunately, we do not have anything more to comment outside of the statement we put out."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/">Activision responds to Scratch lawsuit, court denies restraining order</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://investor.activision.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=377769>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1519518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/16/activision-responds-to-scratch-lawsuit-court-denies-restraining-order/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>activision</category><category>breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo</category><category>business</category><category>dj-hero</category><category>genius-products</category><category>la-superior-court</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>numark</category><category>scratch-the-ultimate-dj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Activision: The Ultimate Lawsuit -- day two]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/15/activision-the-ultimate-lawsuit-day-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/15/activision-the-ultimate-lawsuit-day-two/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/15/activision-the-ultimate-lawsuit-day-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a href="http://gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=23206"><img vspace="0" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/davidandgoliath_580px.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
Day two of news regarding the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/"><em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em> LLC vs. Activision lawsuit</a> has arrived, and with it a comprehensive analysis of the "full 30-page complaint" by way of <a href="http://gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=23206">Gamasutra</a>. Before we launch into that though, we first put this question to you, dearest readers: <em>What the heck do we call this thing</em>? Scratch-gate? Court Scratch Fever? Breakin' (the law) 2: Electric Boogaloo? You tell us!<br /><br />Aside from the litany of information we already know, the piece paints an interesting tale of <a href="http://www.oracle-training.cc/t_webstalker_185_tortuous_interference_.htm">tortuous interference</a> on the side of <em>DJ Hero</em> publisher Activision ostensibly strong-arming <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em> developer Genius Products (and its partner, Numark) into releasing its game later than Activision's. Furthermore, the suit alleges that 7 Studios, former contracted developer of <em>Scratch</em> for Genius Products (and recently purchased by Activision), is still withholding "nine custom-manufactured turntable and beat-button game controllers" belonging to Numark.<br /><br />To help break down the analysis with significantly more expertise and clarity, we contacted <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/lgj">LGJ</a> columnist Mark Methenitis, who had this to say:<br /><br />"If you thought <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/07/19/silicon-knights-sues-epic-over-unreal-engine-3-inadequacies">Silicon Knights vs. Epic</a> had the potential to get ugly, imagine the stakes when the next major branch of the music game genre hangs in the balance. Taking Genius's claims at face value, Activision is basically trying to bully them out of the market so that Activision's own <em>DJ Hero</em> can become the top billing DJ-based music game. This is similar to the claim that Silicon Knights made, where they alleged Epic was neglecting the Unreal Engine 3 licensees to benefit <em>Gears of War</em>. The major difference here is when Activision couldn't buy the game, it bought the developer to control the game's development and attempt to force the hand of Genius. This gets into tortuous interference with the existing development agreement, the basic gist of which is that as a third party, you're not allowed to interfere with someone else's contract. Of course, there's likely another side to this story, which I'm sure Activision will present in its answer to Genius's claims."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/15/activision-the-ultimate-lawsuit-day-two/">Activision: The Ultimate Lawsuit -- day two</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=23206>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/15/activision-the-ultimate-lawsuit-day-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1518461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/15/activision-the-ultimate-lawsuit-day-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>activision</category><category>breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo</category><category>gamasutra</category><category>genius-products</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>mark-methenitis</category><category>numark</category><category>scratch-the-ultimate-dj</category><category>tortuous-interference</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scratch: The Ultimate DJ developer sues Activision]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img vspace="0" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/l42b-goliath.jpg" /><br /></div>
In a David and Goliath story for the ages, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/scratch-the-ultimate-dj/"><em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em></a> LLC (a partnership between <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/genius-products/">Genius Products</a> and Numark formed to develop and publish the game of the same name) have revealed a mountain of details regarding a lawsuit against mega-publisher <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/activision">Activision</a>. The lawsuit alleges Activision and 7 Studios -- contract developer for Genius Products -- have intentionally "conspired to withhold the current version of <em>Scratch</em> in an effort to delay the development and release" of the game. <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ</em> LLC is seeking the immediate return of its game as well as "other injunctive relief."<br /><br />Trevor Drinkwater, president of Genius Products, is quoted as saying, "We believe that Activision and 7 Studios have improperly used confidential information obtained from Genius and 7 Studios to interfere with our efforts to complete the game. In short, we believe that Activision is attempting to sabotage the release of our much anticipated game and prevent it from getting to market prior to the release of <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/dj-hero/"><em>DJ Hero</em></a>." Fighting words indeed! <br /><br />Interestingly, the details revealed this evening also outline Activision's attempt to "acquire" <em>Scratch: The Ultimate DJ </em>from Genius Products, who apparently rebuffed the attempt. Allegedly, Activision then proceeded to purchase 7 Studios and "conspired to prevent <em>Scratch</em> from getting to market on a timely basis" through a variety of means, including withholding "work product, code, and the proprietary game controller." We've still heard nothing from Activision regarding this lawsuit and due to the late arrival of this information, likely won't hear a response from the publisher until tomorrow at the earliest. We can, however, <em>assure you</em> this won't be the last time we hear about this.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/">Scratch: The Ultimate DJ developer sues Activision</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1517307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/04/14/scratch-the-ultimate-dj-developer-sues-activision/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>activision</category><category>breakin-the-law-2-electric-boogaloo</category><category>business</category><category>genius-products</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>numark</category><category>scratch-the-ultimate-dj</category><category>trevor-drinkwater</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Brash stops paying devs, gets sued]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/18/brash-stops-paying-devs-gets-sued/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/18/brash-stops-paying-devs-gets-sued/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/18/brash-stops-paying-devs-gets-sued/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2008/11/brash-sued-by-t.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2008/11/matrix.jellies.490w.jpg"  alt="jelly beans" /></a></div>
Remember when we found out that Brash Entertainment had <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/07/brash-layoffs-result-from-tough-economic-landscape/">stopped paying</a> developers -- you know, a week before the publisher <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/14/variety-brash-to-cease-operations-today/">completely folded</a>? Yeah, well, two of those developers have finally come a-knockin'. 7 Studios and Zootfly have both sued Brash in efforts to win back some of the money they're owed. 7 Studios' bill stands at $468,000 for work on <em>9</em>, an adaptation of an upcoming Tim Burton flick, and $113,000 for <em>Six Flags Fun Park</em>, which 7 Studios CEO Lewis Peterson calls "the best game Brash had produced." Additionally, Zootfly claims it's owed a whopping $748,000 for a <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/08/15/brash-planning-prison-break-game/"><em>Prison Break</em> game</a>.<br /><br />Meanwhile, in other Brash news, former president Nicholas Longano has popped up as the new co-founder of Music Mogul, a pending virtual world for aspiring musicians. Good to see inane execs are still getting work these days!<br /><br />[Image credit: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ninjanoodles/1586212326/">Night Star Romanus</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/18/brash-stops-paying-devs-gets-sued/">Brash stops paying devs, gets sued</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://weblogs.variety.com/the_cut_scene/2008/11/brash-sued-by-t.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/18/brash-stops-paying-devs-gets-sued/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/1375733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/18/brash-stops-paying-devs-gets-sued/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-studios</category><category>brash-entertainment</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>zootfly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Ransom-Wiley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>