<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Joystiq</title>
<link>http://www.joystiq.com</link>
<description>Joystiq</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Empire at War coming to the Mac]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/30/empire-at-war-coming-to-the-mac/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/30/empire-at-war-coming-to-the-mac/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/30/empire-at-war-coming-to-the-mac/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/mac/" rel="tag">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/online/" rel="tag">Online</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/strategy/" rel="tag">Strategy</a></p><a href="http://marketing.aspyr.com/newsletters/Aspyr_November_2006/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="middle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2006/11/empire_at_war_mac.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="Empire at War coming to the Mac" /></a><br />The Mac version of <em>Star Wars: Empire at War</em> won't be ready for Santa's sleigh, but Aspyr Media reports they've entered the testing phase, and the Petroglyph strategy port should be available in February. MacBook and Mini owners with <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/">integrated graphics</a> won't have to worry about the game's performance, either. According to lead programmer Brad Oliver, Aspyr's goal is to make sure <em>Empire</em> plays well on ALL Macs. That is, until the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/10/30/metareview-empire-at-war-forces-of-corruption/">expansion pack</a> is ported and Tyber Zann assumes control of your hard disk.<br /><br />See also: <br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/27/holiday-2006-best-bets-for-mac-gamers/">Holiday 2006 best bets for Mac gamers</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://driving.joystiq.com/2006/11/28/kotor-franchise-to-continue/"><em>KotOR</em> franchise to continue, says LucasArts</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/15/star-wars-pc-collection-ships-next-week/">Star Wars PC collection ships<br /></a></li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/30/empire-at-war-coming-to-the-mac/">Empire at War coming to the Mac</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://marketing.aspyr.com/newsletters/Aspyr_November_2006/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/30/empire-at-war-coming-to-the-mac/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/710376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/30/empire-at-war-coming-to-the-mac/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>Aspyr Media</category><category>Brad Oliver</category><category>Empire at War</category><category>integrated graphics</category><category>mac</category><category>mac games</category><category>mac gaming</category><category>macbook</category><category>macbook pro</category><category>petroglyph</category><category>rts</category><category>Star Wars</category><category>strategy</category><category>Tyber Zann</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Rose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD to keep ATI brand, may create more integrated chips]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/08/amd-to-keep-ati-brand-may-create-more-integrated-chips/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/08/amd-to-keep-ati-brand-may-create-more-integrated-chips/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/08/amd-to-keep-ati-brand-may-create-more-integrated-chips/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/pc/" rel="tag">PC</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a></p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/custompc/news/news/91650"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2006/07/amd-buys-ati-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a>After some <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/custompc/news/news/91593">initial rumblings</a> that indicated otherwise, AMD has <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/custompc/news/news/91650">reaffirmed</a> their desire to attach the ATI brand to several of their forthcoming product lines. "The ATi name will live on at AMD as our leading consumer brand, and so will the Radeon brand and other ATi product brands," says spokesperson Eric DeRitis. "AMD's executive management knows very well the power and value of branding, and ATi's branding is some of the most valued in the global technology industry. As such, we plan to keep it. Period."<br /><br />The nature of the products to be branded as such have yet to be fully disclosed, but already AMD is <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/custompc/news/91629/amd-hints-at-integrated-graphics-and-physics-acceleration-in-cpus.html">hinting</a> at providing more integrated graphics solutions. Indeed, the branding may become especially vital when faced with the widespread (and arguably correct) perception that "integrated graphics" is merely a shorter term for referring to that worthless piece of tech that came with your computer and can barely push two frames per second in the latest <em>Tiger Woods</em> game. According to their marketing manager for Europe, AMD sees integrating graphics acceleration directly into the CPU as the next logical step. <br /><br />"So, in much the same way as a floating point unit is now integrated into the processor, I would expect to see joint single pieces of silicon for certain specialist markets too." Richard Baker restrains the idea a bit, though, and says that AMD won't "integrate some steaming great big quad-core CrossFire engine into a CPU; that would be crazy. But if you're looking at entry level parts for emerging markets, where a very simple GPU could be integrated, then that could be possible."<br /><br />The true fallout of the AMD/ATI deal will likely become most evident once the new product lines show up which, if Baker is to be believed, could happen as early as next year. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/custompc/news/news/91650">Read</a> - AMD stays hand over ATI brand axe<br /><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/custompc/news/91629/amd-hints-at-integrated-graphics-and-physics-acceleration-in-cpus.html">Read</a> - AMD hints at integrated graphics and physics acceleration in CPUs<br /><br /><strong>Previously: <br /></strong>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/24/amd-to-buy-ati-for-5-4-billion/">AMD to buy ATI for $5.4 billion</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/25/nvidia-on-ati-basically-throwing-in-the-towel/">Nvidia on ATI: "basically throwing in the towel"</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/27/ati-responds-to-nvidia-clears-up-post-takeover-rumors/">ATI responds to Nvidia, clears up post-takeover rumors</a></li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/08/amd-to-keep-ati-brand-may-create-more-integrated-chips/">AMD to keep ATI brand, may create more integrated chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/08/amd-to-keep-ati-brand-may-create-more-integrated-chips/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/652376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/08/amd-to-keep-ati-brand-may-create-more-integrated-chips/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>ATI</category><category>CPU</category><category>GPU</category><category>Integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>Intel</category><category>Nvidia</category><category>PC</category><category>physics acceleration</category><category>PhysicsAcceleration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludwig Kietzmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Epic's Mark Rein: Intel is killing PC Gaming]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/12/epics-mark-rein-intel-is-killing-pc-gaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/12/epics-mark-rein-intel-is-killing-pc-gaming/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/12/epics-mark-rein-intel-is-killing-pc-gaming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/pc/" rel="tag">PC</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a></p><center><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2006/07/snipshot_ekx75nun5.jpg" /></center>A couple of hours ago, Epic Vice President Mark Rein opened <a href="http://www.developconference.com/">the Develop Conference in Brighton</a> with a keynote covering topics ranging from the economics of next-generation games, episodic content and middleware (which, incidentally, Epic makes a lot of its money from). The majority of the second half of his keynote took a critical look at Intel's place within gaming; specifically, Mark thinks <em>"Intel is killing PC gaming".</em><br /><br />Over several slides on the topic, Mark laid out the reasons he thinks that PC gaming is being harmed by Intel. He pointed the finger at Intel's integrated graphics chips. Integrated chipsets are often incapable of playing the latest (and certainly next-generation) games at any kind of graphics settings. Despite this, they are wildly popular amongst retailers. According to Mark's figures, 80% of laptops and 55% of desktops (note: he failed to cite a source for these figures) feature integrated graphics. That's bad news for companies like Epic, which are investing heavily into extremely demanding next-generation games.<br /><br />If next-generation games don't run on the vast majority of computers, big-name and -money developers will lose (or have already lost) their bottom end. At the same time, the higher end is getting higher. The last year has produced widespread-SLI adoption within the hardcore PC gaming community and new technologies like Quad-SLI, Quad-CPUs, physics processors and $10,000+ PCs.<br /><br />Over the next couple of days we'll be exploring this keynote and other seminars from Develop in more depth, but for now we'll ask you the same questions that Mark asked the audience:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Do games like <em>The Sims, World of WarCraft </em>and other low-budget Asian MMOs prove Mark's hypothesis, that PC gaming is going away because of Intel, wrong?</li>
    <li>Will console MMOs put the nail in the coffin of PC gaming?</li>
    <li>How come big publishers aren't placing big bets on PC gaming? (Mark says that he knows of at least two "major" developers that are considering moving exclusively to console based development, although he failed to elaborate on which ones).</li>
    <li>Will the PC market be relegated to only mass-market and casual games?</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/12/epics-mark-rein-intel-is-killing-pc-gaming/">Epic's Mark Rein: Intel is killing PC Gaming</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/12/epics-mark-rein-intel-is-killing-pc-gaming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/641976/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/07/12/epics-mark-rein-intel-is-killing-pc-gaming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Develop Conference</category><category>develop06</category><category>DevelopConference</category><category>Epic</category><category>Integrated Graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>Intel</category><category>Mark Rein</category><category>MarkRein</category><category>PC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More integrated graphics from Apple]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/mac/" rel="tag">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/pc/" rel="tag">PC</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/business/" rel="tag">Business</a></p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/2006/05/McBookintegrated.jpg" /></a>Apple released the MacBook, its new consumer laptop, today. The full tech specs -- which are over <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs.html">at Apple's site</a> -- mention that the MacBook features an Intel GMA950: in other words, an integrated graphics chip identical to the Mac mini. Previously we've summarized <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/02/28/intel-mac-mini-lacks-dedicated-graphics-hardware/">the disadvantages of integrated graphics</a> and we've moaned about the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2005/10/29/apples-game-hardware-line-up-still-underpowered/3">poor graphics performance of Apple's line-up</a> in an attempt to force someone at Apple to listen, but it was all in vain. <br /><br />Apple's supposed "gaming solution" (<a href="http://joystiq.com/2006/04/05/apples-official-mac-gaming-solution-windows/">Windows</a>) is hardly a solution now that Apple's consumer line-up (<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs.html">MacBook</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/whatsinside.html">Mac mini</a>) doesn't have a dedicated graphics card, the prosumer line-up (<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/specs.html">MacBook Pro</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/graphics.html">iMac</a>) features a low- to mid-range mobile chip and the remaining top-of-the-range machine (<a href="http://www.apple.com/powermac/graphics.html">PowerMac</a>) is stuck with PowerPC processors, crappy default GPUs (GeForce 6600s, yuck!) and a largely unobtainable price.<br /><br />If Apple one days wakes up and realizes that there are a load of potential gaming switchers sitting on the fence it would either: tell, no, <em>force</em> Intel to make some integrated chips that aren't <a href="http://tomshardware.co.uk/2005/09/15/are_intel/page4.html">"virtually unplayable for anybody that cares about gaming"</a> or provide the option of dedicated graphics cards for gamers, even if it costs us more.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/">More integrated graphics from Apple</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.apple.com/macbook/macbook.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/618826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/16/more-integrated-graphics-from-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Computer gaming</category><category>ComputerGaming</category><category>FPS</category><category>G5</category><category>Games</category><category>Gaming</category><category>GeForce</category><category>GMA950</category><category>GPUs</category><category>Integrated graphics</category><category>IntegratedGraphics</category><category>Intel</category><category>Intel Core Duo</category><category>IntelCoreDuo</category><category>Mac</category><category>Mac mini</category><category>MacBook</category><category>MacBook Pro</category><category>MacbookPro</category><category>MacMini</category><category>OS X</category><category>OsX</category><category>PC</category><category>PowerMac</category><category>Windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Quilty-Harper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>