<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Joystiq</title>
<link>http://www.joystiq.com</link>
<description>Joystiq</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Failed Louisiana video game bill sponsor speaks out]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/10/failed-louisiana-video-game-bill-sponsor-speaks-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/10/failed-louisiana-video-game-bill-sponsor-speaks-out/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/10/failed-louisiana-video-game-bill-sponsor-speaks-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a></p><a href="http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070510/OPINION0106/705100332/1058/OPINION03"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2007/05/jt-burrell.jpg" /></a>Following an <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/16/judge-louisiana-must-pay-esas-legal-bill-taxpayers-crap/">embarrassing defeat</a> of his unconstitutional video game bill, Louisiana Rep. Roy Burrell (D) <a href="http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070510/OPINION0106/705100332/1058/OPINION03">wrote an op-ed piece</a> in this morning's <em>Shreveport Times</em>. The newspaper had previously criticized him and it seemed he was attempting to explain himself. The naive representative worked with Jack Thompson to pen the bill that would not only eventually get <a href="http://www.hacks.joystiq.com/2006/08/25/federal-judge-stops-louisiana-game-law/">defeated</a>, but would force Louisiana taxpayers to pony up the $100,000 in legal fees to the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/tag/ESA/">ESA</a> for wasting their time fighting the bill. From the op-ed piece Burrell still doesn't quite get what's wrong.<br /><br />Burrell (pictured with Jack Thompson) writes, "I am offended <em>The Times </em>and one federal judge would question state legislators' commitment, integrity and legal knowledge because of a controversial constitutional court ruling on the protection of the First Amendment Right of free speech. Like me, during the legislative process, legislators never knew they would vote unanimously on HB 1381, only to have it struck down by a federal district judge, then publicly criticized by him and the media for doing their legislative duty. This is appalling. Conversely, they should be commended and not humiliated on standing up finally for children and families against the powerful entertainment industry."<br /><br />So, not only was Burrell "humiliated," but he ended up costing taxpayers 100 grand. He says it's worth it if it stops one child from being harmed by "mind-altering harmful ultra-violent video games." Burrell closes saying, "It is difficult for me to ignore the facts that explicitly sexual and ultra-violent video games are severely and adversely affecting our children's behavior." Sorry Roy, no facts, you just got <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/search/?q=Jack Thompson">Jack</a>.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/05/10/louisiana-video-game-law-sponsor-defends-failed-law/">GamePolitics</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/10/failed-louisiana-video-game-bill-sponsor-speaks-out/">Failed Louisiana video game bill sponsor speaks out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Thu, 10 May 2007 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070510/OPINION0106/705100332/1058/OPINION03>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/10/failed-louisiana-video-game-bill-sponsor-speaks-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/892985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/10/failed-louisiana-video-game-bill-sponsor-speaks-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>burrell</category><category>failure</category><category>game bill</category><category>jack thompson</category><category>JackThompson</category><category>louisiana</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Sliwinski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Massachusetts tries Jack Thompson's failed Utah game bill]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-tries-jack-thompsons-failed-utah-game-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-tries-jack-thompsons-failed-utah-game-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-tries-jack-thompsons-failed-utah-game-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-video-game-legislation-resembles-failed-bills-from-utah-louisiana/"><img width="225" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="291" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2007/04/charliebrown.jpg" alt="" /></a>Massachusetts' legislators have been <a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-video-game-legislation-resembles-failed-bills-from-utah-louisiana/">offered</a> up <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/185/ht01pdf/ht01423.pdf">HB 1423</a>, a game bill which seeks to "restrict the sale of video games wih [sic] violent content to minors." "Harmful to minors" is defined as content describing or representing nudity, sexual conduct or sexual excitement, "so as to appeal predominantly to the prurient interest of minors." Section four of the bill is where the civil rights lawyers are going to have a field day. It states a game is harmful to minors if it "lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors." That's about as broad as making brush strokes with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mister_Fantastic">Mr. Fantastic's</a> super powers.<br /><br />Why does this all seem <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/08/jack-thompson-helps-bostons-mayor-menino-draft-legislation/">oddly familiar</a>? This bill was created with the assistance of Jack Thompson and similar versions were shot down in <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/21/why-utah-ag-shurtleff-and-jack-thompson-dont-get-along-the-v/">Utah</a> and deemed <a href="http://www.hacks.joystiq.com/2006/08/25/federal-judge-stops-louisiana-game-law/">unconstitutional</a> in Louisiana. Mayor Thomas Menino, one of the petitioners of the bill, was one of those who pushed through a <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/14/boston-transit-system-bans-m-rated-game-ads">ban on M rated game advertisements</a> on the subway and got very upset during the infamous <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/specials/local/cartoon_devices/"><em>Aqua Teen Hunger Force</em> bomb incident</a>. Hopefully this bill will die somewhere along the path, because we're sure the citizens of Massachusetts aren't looking to <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/11/illinois-governor-ordered-to-hurry-up-and-pay-esa/">pay back the ESA</a> when this bill is deemed unconstitutional in the courts ... again.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-tries-jack-thompsons-failed-utah-game-bill/">Massachusetts tries Jack Thompson's failed Utah game bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-video-game-legislation-resembles-failed-bills-from-utah-louisiana/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-tries-jack-thompsons-failed-utah-game-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/872486/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/11/massachusetts-tries-jack-thompsons-failed-utah-game-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston</category><category>failure</category><category>game bill</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>utah</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Sliwinski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oregon attempts game bill because Timmy broke Mary's arm]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/10/oregon-attempts-game-bill-because-timmy-broke-marys-arm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/10/oregon-attempts-game-bill-because-timmy-broke-marys-arm/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/10/oregon-attempts-game-bill-because-timmy-broke-marys-arm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/10/oregon-legislature-considers-video-game-bill/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2007/04/oregontrail.jpg" alt="" /></a>GamePolitics <a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/10/oregon-legislature-considers-video-game-bill/">reports</a> the Oregon House of Reps. is trying to blaze new trails by introducing a law making it unlawful to sell "ultra-violent" video games to people of the great state under 18 years of age. The bill was introduced by Rep. Arnie Roblan (D) and has no provision on what punishment would be given for those breaking the law, it also grants exception for parents who choose to purchase the game for their child. So, what's the point of this thing again?<br /><br />Anyway, best part of the bill is the <a href="http://landru.leg.state.or.us/07reg/measures/hb3500.dir/hb3511.intro.html">definition</a> of "ultra-violent." The bill states, "'Ultra-violent video game' means a video game depicting serious injury to human beings in a manner that is especially heinous, atrocious or cruel." So, killing an alien, smearing its blood all over your avatar and then eating its entrails would be fine -- it's not a "human." That's quite speciesist, I hope the great state of Oregon has an excuse set up when the aliens arrive.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/10/oregon-attempts-game-bill-because-timmy-broke-marys-arm/">Oregon attempts game bill because Timmy broke Mary's arm</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/10/oregon-legislature-considers-video-game-bill/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/10/oregon-attempts-game-bill-because-timmy-broke-marys-arm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/870899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/04/10/oregon-attempts-game-bill-because-timmy-broke-marys-arm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>death</category><category>game bill</category><category>kill</category><category>murder</category><category>oregon</category><category>oregon trail</category><category>ultra-violent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Sliwinski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Senator Brownback brings back game bill]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/14/senator-brownback-brings-back-game-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/14/senator-brownback-brings-back-game-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/14/senator-brownback-brings-back-game-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a></p><a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/02/14/presidential-candidate-brownback-revives-game-ratings-bill-in-senate/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2007/02/clockworkbrownback.jpg" /></a>Presidential hopeful, Kansas Republican Sen. Sam Brownback, has re-introduced a bill that would require the ESRB play every game, all the way through, before assigning a rating. Every nook and cranny of that Thomas' English gaming muffin would have to be explored before slapping a rating on the title.<br /><br />Feel that generation gap widening? This all goes back to our own <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/13/what-games-are-you-ashamed-to-say-youve-never-played/">issues</a> of not being able to finish games. Forget good games, what about having to finish the bad ones? The very idea of playing a game all the way through before assigning a rating shows how completely out-of-touch the Truth in Video Game Rating Act is. Will Brownback explain on the campaign trail the tax hike required to fund the army necessary to ferret out all the info from these games? The bill would also require the Government Accountability Office to the study the effectiveness of the ESRB and evaluate the potential for an independent system not involved with the video game industry. Imagine if the ESRB said they just couldn't afford the manpower required. The U.S. government would have to make the Department of Video Game Rating Security.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/14/senator-brownback-brings-back-game-bill/">Senator Brownback brings back game bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gamepolitics.com/2007/02/14/presidential-candidate-brownback-revives-game-ratings-bill-in-senate/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/14/senator-brownback-brings-back-game-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/753934/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/14/senator-brownback-brings-back-game-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brownback</category><category>esrb</category><category>game bill</category><category>play everything</category><category>senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Sliwinski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Utah game bill halted for now]]></title><link>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/27/utah-game-bill-halted-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/27/utah-game-bill-halted-for-now/</guid><comments>http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/27/utah-game-bill-halted-for-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/category/culture/" rel="tag">Culture</a></p><a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/01/27/utah-house-committee-puts-brakes-on-video-game-bill/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2007/01/killutahbill.jpg" alt="" /></a>The Public Utilities and Technology Committee of Utah's House of Representatives placed Rep. Scott Wyatt's video game bill on hold. Wyatt's bill is another in a long list of "<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/11/17/the-political-game-its-the-economy-stupid/">games-as-porn</a>" bills, "protecting children from video game violence." The bill has been on shaky ground since Utah's Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said he had serious concerns about the constitutionality of the bill, which is similar to others that have been <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/12/11/illinois-governor-ordered-to-hurry-up-and-pay-esa/">dismissed</a>.<br /><br />Attorney Jack Thompson, who helped write the bill, is sure to send a press release out soon. Thompson and Attorney General Shurtleff have been <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/20/jack-thompson-and-utah-ag-have-spat/">butting heads</a> for the last couple of weeks over the constitutionality of the proposed legislation. <br /><br />For those interested in listening to the committee hearing, there is an <a href="http://media41b.libsyn.com/podcasts/e5937a25d9041e9a41d925182198ebf2/45bba197/gamepolitics/utah-hb50-012607.mp3">audio recording</a> available at GamePolitics. Just to give a basic idea of what's in this bill, it's worth listening to the audio recording. For example, if a child is in the room when an M rated game is being shown it is a "third-degree felony," subject to a fine "of not less than $300" and "not less than 14 days" of incarceration. Yeah, that sounds like a constitutional law.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.joystiq.com"><img src="http://www.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Joystiq" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/27/utah-game-bill-halted-for-now/">Utah game bill halted for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.joystiq.com">Joystiq</a> on Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gamepolitics.com/2007/01/27/utah-house-committee-puts-brakes-on-video-game-bill/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/27/utah-game-bill-halted-for-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/forward/743691/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/01/27/utah-game-bill-halted-for-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>game bill</category><category>jack thompson</category><category>utah</category><category>wyatt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Sliwinski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>