| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (40)

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:32PM KiDPANDA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well theres one mode i wont bother with now.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:45PM baby sea tuna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Eh, doesn't matter to me since I don't actually know anyone else with a 3DS anyway.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:53PM dscuber9000 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@baby sea tuna

Nintendo should create some kind of inter-connectivity so people can play each other from long distances.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:05PM baby sea tuna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@dscuber9000

When I think "Nintendo" the first thing that comes to mind is certainly "competent online strategy"
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:39PM foxhound said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@baby sea tuna
Exactly. I'll gladly trade my PSN/XBL screen names for the awesomeness that is FRIEND CODES. ;D
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:44PM Tihn said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@baby sea tuna
I know what you mean. I don't know anyone else with a PS3 so when it comes to playing online it's always against random strangers. Unlike my Xbox which everyone has.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:50PM LightningXCE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"I wonder why Nintendo would ditch the old multiplayer suite."

Because the old multiplayer, while having the ability to use Landmaster and of foot, sucked massively.

Go back and try playing it now, it's absolutely horrible. Their level design consisted of a plane with a 4 triangle pyramid in the middle, or two cubes to hide behind.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:07PM TheShaper said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@LightningXCE
I wouldn't need to play it now, I still have those horrible memories.

Ah, of course, single player is awesome.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 4:31PM KaBob799 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I never liked the multiplayer. I didn't realize some people actually thought it was awesome.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:52PM Hunter141072 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I wonder.....when we are going to see the title that pumps some real success on the 3ds???? is this the one??? because so far this console has been a real disappointment....

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:12PM Jinketsu said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Hunter141072

So far it's a nostalgia bandwagon. Which was the selling point for me.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:16PM Link408 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like that AdHoc Party or whatever it's called for PSP?
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And we're sure that they can't just be unlocked in the single-player mode like in the original Star Fox 64? (which was still a remake)

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:06PM MEMgrizzlies7 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)
Star Fox 64 wasn't so much a remake as it was spiritual successor. There was much more new than old.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MEMgrizzlies7

Retelling, then, if you will. I just mean that they pretty much replaced the SNES original's place in the canon.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:10PM TheShaper said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)
Seriously, who gives a damn to Star Fox storyline? I honestly never though I'd see the expression "Star Fox canon" in my life.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:12PM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MEMgrizzlies7

Star Fox 64 was a remake, called so by Nintendo itself.

It's storyline replaced the original storyline from Star Fox.

They took many aspects of Star Fox 2 and added them in Star Fox 64. Such as all-range mode and Star Wolf.

As far as Nintendo goes, Star Fox 64 completely replaced the original. Hell. they don't even offer the original on the VC.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:11PM Gooblechev said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Star Fox > Star Fox 64

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:54PM spekkio said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@That One Guy
Greater than complete bullshit? How 'bout less than.

That Statement < Complete Bullshit
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Gooblechev I agree. It had a different feel, with stuff like the music in the asteroid levels (and elsewhere), scrambled speech and the graphic style.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:37PM Nook said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@That One Guy

Then that means that it is MORE BS, because less would mean it is made up of other things. Like alfalfa. or bananas.

We have a clear cut case of maximum BS. Which is greater.

The framerate is pretty hard to go back to as well. That's the main thing for me.
Reply

Posted: Jul 24th 2011 12:46AM Gooblechev said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@That One Guy I admit, it's mostly a case of rose-colored glasses.

Though the original was a good game!
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:14PM SuperWoody64 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo is the king of mis-reading their fans.

"our fans don't want online" - yes we do
"our fans don't want high definition" - yes we do
"our fans want to wiggle a remote around for hours on end" - no we don't
I'm glad they traded the wii remote for a regular controller but then they screwed it up by having only one be usable at a time - "our fans want to play by themselves"

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:23PM Juelz345 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SuperWoody64

While i'm also dissapointed that the Wii U is being limited (for now) to only one uPad, the more i tink about it, the less it matters.

It wont matter for single player games and the vast majority of my multiplayer games (even those that offer local multiplayer) are played online. The only mulitplayer games that I regularly play locally are fighting games and fifa, and i'll just get those games for 360 or PS3.

For me, the Wii U games that matter will be the core first party nintendo games, which mainly consist of single player experiences (excpet for Mario Kart and Smash Bros).
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 9:24PM Suichimo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SuperWoody64

"our fans don't want online" - yes we do

Its been nearly a whole generation since Yamauchi was in power at Nintendo. Iwata very much likes online. Also, you already have it and have had it, full on, since the DS.

"our fans don't want high definition" - yes we do

Nintendo never said that fans didn't want HD... The reason the Wii wasn't HD was because the penetration of HD TVs was extremely low at the time. Also, you're getting it with Wii U.

"our fans want to wiggle a remote around for hours on end" - no we don't

Well, now you're getting both.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:15PM Juelz345 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While online multiplayer would have been nice, especially since i'm don't currently know anyone else with a 3DS, i'll still be picking this up.

I plan on purchasinf two 3DS for my sons for christmas, so i'll at least have them to play with come December. I'm sure i'll enjoy the campaign as much as i'm enjoying OoT...I hope.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:46PM Tihn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope they call it Lylat Wars 3D here because Star Fox 64 3D sounds spazzy.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 7:08PM Super Nintendo Chalmers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tihn
Same, i'd prefer Lylat Wars tbh.
Whenever i hear "Starfox 64" I think "what the hell is that?"....
Followed by "OOh, they mean Lylat Wars"
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:16PM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And "Lylat Wars" sounds goofy as hell to people who had it released under it's original name.

Even "StarWing" (the original Star Fox's name in European countries) was better than that.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 4:27PM spartalaughs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I will be doing a barrel roll.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 5:19PM nusilver said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously? No tanks or on-foot multiplayer? That was what made this game awesome to me - the ability to chase Arwings on foot and treads. Bullshit.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 5:32PM smartt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...something different will make me blue

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:06PM Suichimo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Something borrowed, something blue?

Is there a TARDIS cameo in the game or something?

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:55PM Solais said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is it called Star Fox 64 if its not on the 64?

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 7:59PM xxxsam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Solais Maybe because it's still not running on a 64-bit system, just like the last one? ;)
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:18PM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Solais

Because it's an enchance remake of Star Fox 64, which was named Star Fox 64.

xxxsam, I hope you aren't implying the Nintendo 64 wasn't 64-bit.

And "the last one" should be cleared up. There has been 3 Star Fox games since Star Fox 64.
Reply

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:56PM spartalaughs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gbhifds7a9 Unless you're selling SF643D, we don't care.

Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 10:55PM KGameLover1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NOOOOO I WILL NOT BE BUYING THIS NOW FUUUUU

Oh wait, the multiplayer originally was terrible, now that I think about it, (Nah, this game is boring, let's go back to Goldeneye! (Yeah!)) and...


I don't have a 3DS anyway. One or two titles is not enough to justify a system purchase, no matter how great they both are. You know which two I'm talking about.

Posted: Jul 24th 2011 8:46PM VideoGameParadise said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it is awesome that they are trying to bring back the N64 game concept even if it is handheld. Some of the best games were released on this console. It also gives developers another shot to create at this level.

Posted: Sep 28th 2011 12:41PM lisacadre23hotmailcom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who doesn't love firefox, Firefox 64 bring up warm memories for anyone?

http://www.napoliclassics.com

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW