Remember how fun Star Fox 64 was? And remember how fun the multiplayer was, with the tanks and the Arwings? If you were looking for a more portable version of that multiplayer experience ... well, you won't find it in Star Fox 64 3D. Oddly enough, the original multiplayer mode has been scrapped in favor of something different.
There are three different multiplayer modes: Survival, Score Attack and Time Attack. Survival is an elimination-based mode, while the latter two task players with scoring the most points overall in a match and in a set amount of time, respectively. Each of these game types modify the formula slightly, but overall the goal is the same: shoot everyone else and don't get shot yourself. It's basic stuff.
Four maps are available for dogfighting: Corneria, Venom, MacBeth and Meteo. Each level feels open and is set up much like an arena, though Corneria was the real stand-out with its tall skycrapers and freeways. I flew into them several times while I tried to escape from the bogey on my tail (that's what pilots say, right?).
Power-ups also make an appearance, allowing players to unleash a flurry of deadly homing missiles or switch positions with the nearest player. The latter move works especially well, since a majority of my experience in the multiplayer consisted of freaking out about a plane on my six (my pilot lingo is coming along, yes?). Using this power-up, I could instantly switch spots with my pursuer and change roles from prey to predator.
The multiplayer was serviceable and, at times, quite fun, but I wonder why Nintendo would ditch the old multiplayer suite. Considering this game is trying to capitalize on (what else?) nostalgia, and introduce new players to the franchise, why wouldn't the Big N include the same multiplayer I spent so many hours playing in my younger years? Maybe the 3DS just can't render tanks?
Regardless, the multiplayer certainly won't turn fans away -- it undeniably feels like Star Fox and extends the game appropriately. It's also worth pointing out that the multiplayer only supports local wireless, though the ability to game share with other individuals is a nice feature. Still, it's curious that Nintendo wouldn't add online features when spending time to develop this new multiplayer mode; it's not like there was a new single-player campaign occupying its time.
Reader Comments (40)
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:32PM KiDPANDA said
well theres one mode i wont bother with now.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:45PM baby sea tuna said
Eh, doesn't matter to me since I don't actually know anyone else with a 3DS anyway.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:53PM dscuber9000 said
@baby sea tuna
Nintendo should create some kind of inter-connectivity so people can play each other from long distances.
Reply
Nintendo should create some kind of inter-connectivity so people can play each other from long distances.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:05PM baby sea tuna said
@dscuber9000
When I think "Nintendo" the first thing that comes to mind is certainly "competent online strategy"
Reply
When I think "Nintendo" the first thing that comes to mind is certainly "competent online strategy"
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:50PM LightningXCE said
"I wonder why Nintendo would ditch the old multiplayer suite."
Because the old multiplayer, while having the ability to use Landmaster and of foot, sucked massively.
Go back and try playing it now, it's absolutely horrible. Their level design consisted of a plane with a 4 triangle pyramid in the middle, or two cubes to hide behind.
Because the old multiplayer, while having the ability to use Landmaster and of foot, sucked massively.
Go back and try playing it now, it's absolutely horrible. Their level design consisted of a plane with a 4 triangle pyramid in the middle, or two cubes to hide behind.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:52PM Hunter141072 said
I wonder.....when we are going to see the title that pumps some real success on the 3ds???? is this the one??? because so far this console has been a real disappointment....
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 1:58PM (Unverified) said
And we're sure that they can't just be unlocked in the single-player mode like in the original Star Fox 64? (which was still a remake)
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:06PM MEMgrizzlies7 said
@(Unverified)
Star Fox 64 wasn't so much a remake as it was spiritual successor. There was much more new than old.
Reply
Star Fox 64 wasn't so much a remake as it was spiritual successor. There was much more new than old.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:19PM (Unverified) said
@MEMgrizzlies7
Retelling, then, if you will. I just mean that they pretty much replaced the SNES original's place in the canon.
Reply
Retelling, then, if you will. I just mean that they pretty much replaced the SNES original's place in the canon.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:12PM Drakkenfyre said
@MEMgrizzlies7
Star Fox 64 was a remake, called so by Nintendo itself.
It's storyline replaced the original storyline from Star Fox.
They took many aspects of Star Fox 2 and added them in Star Fox 64. Such as all-range mode and Star Wolf.
As far as Nintendo goes, Star Fox 64 completely replaced the original. Hell. they don't even offer the original on the VC.
Reply
Star Fox 64 was a remake, called so by Nintendo itself.
It's storyline replaced the original storyline from Star Fox.
They took many aspects of Star Fox 2 and added them in Star Fox 64. Such as all-range mode and Star Wolf.
As far as Nintendo goes, Star Fox 64 completely replaced the original. Hell. they don't even offer the original on the VC.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 2:11PM Gooblechev said
Star Fox > Star Fox 64
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:06PM (Unverified) said
@Gooblechev I agree. It had a different feel, with stuff like the music in the asteroid levels (and elsewhere), scrambled speech and the graphic style.
Reply
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:37PM Nook said
@That One Guy
Then that means that it is MORE BS, because less would mean it is made up of other things. Like alfalfa. or bananas.
We have a clear cut case of maximum BS. Which is greater.
The framerate is pretty hard to go back to as well. That's the main thing for me.
Reply
Then that means that it is MORE BS, because less would mean it is made up of other things. Like alfalfa. or bananas.
We have a clear cut case of maximum BS. Which is greater.
The framerate is pretty hard to go back to as well. That's the main thing for me.
Posted: Jul 24th 2011 12:46AM Gooblechev said
@That One Guy I admit, it's mostly a case of rose-colored glasses.
Though the original was a good game!
Reply
Though the original was a good game!
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:14PM SuperWoody64 said
Nintendo is the king of mis-reading their fans.
"our fans don't want online" - yes we do
"our fans don't want high definition" - yes we do
"our fans want to wiggle a remote around for hours on end" - no we don't
I'm glad they traded the wii remote for a regular controller but then they screwed it up by having only one be usable at a time - "our fans want to play by themselves"
"our fans don't want online" - yes we do
"our fans don't want high definition" - yes we do
"our fans want to wiggle a remote around for hours on end" - no we don't
I'm glad they traded the wii remote for a regular controller but then they screwed it up by having only one be usable at a time - "our fans want to play by themselves"
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:23PM Juelz345 said
@SuperWoody64
While i'm also dissapointed that the Wii U is being limited (for now) to only one uPad, the more i tink about it, the less it matters.
It wont matter for single player games and the vast majority of my multiplayer games (even those that offer local multiplayer) are played online. The only mulitplayer games that I regularly play locally are fighting games and fifa, and i'll just get those games for 360 or PS3.
For me, the Wii U games that matter will be the core first party nintendo games, which mainly consist of single player experiences (excpet for Mario Kart and Smash Bros).
Reply
While i'm also dissapointed that the Wii U is being limited (for now) to only one uPad, the more i tink about it, the less it matters.
It wont matter for single player games and the vast majority of my multiplayer games (even those that offer local multiplayer) are played online. The only mulitplayer games that I regularly play locally are fighting games and fifa, and i'll just get those games for 360 or PS3.
For me, the Wii U games that matter will be the core first party nintendo games, which mainly consist of single player experiences (excpet for Mario Kart and Smash Bros).
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 9:24PM Suichimo said
@SuperWoody64
"our fans don't want online" - yes we do
Its been nearly a whole generation since Yamauchi was in power at Nintendo. Iwata very much likes online. Also, you already have it and have had it, full on, since the DS.
"our fans don't want high definition" - yes we do
Nintendo never said that fans didn't want HD... The reason the Wii wasn't HD was because the penetration of HD TVs was extremely low at the time. Also, you're getting it with Wii U.
"our fans want to wiggle a remote around for hours on end" - no we don't
Well, now you're getting both.
Reply
"our fans don't want online" - yes we do
Its been nearly a whole generation since Yamauchi was in power at Nintendo. Iwata very much likes online. Also, you already have it and have had it, full on, since the DS.
"our fans don't want high definition" - yes we do
Nintendo never said that fans didn't want HD... The reason the Wii wasn't HD was because the penetration of HD TVs was extremely low at the time. Also, you're getting it with Wii U.
"our fans want to wiggle a remote around for hours on end" - no we don't
Well, now you're getting both.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:15PM Juelz345 said
While online multiplayer would have been nice, especially since i'm don't currently know anyone else with a 3DS, i'll still be picking this up.
I plan on purchasinf two 3DS for my sons for christmas, so i'll at least have them to play with come December. I'm sure i'll enjoy the campaign as much as i'm enjoying OoT...I hope.
I plan on purchasinf two 3DS for my sons for christmas, so i'll at least have them to play with come December. I'm sure i'll enjoy the campaign as much as i'm enjoying OoT...I hope.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 3:46PM Tihn said
I hope they call it Lylat Wars 3D here because Star Fox 64 3D sounds spazzy.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 7:08PM Super Nintendo Chalmers said
@Tihn
Same, i'd prefer Lylat Wars tbh.
Whenever i hear "Starfox 64" I think "what the hell is that?"....
Followed by "OOh, they mean Lylat Wars"
Reply
Same, i'd prefer Lylat Wars tbh.
Whenever i hear "Starfox 64" I think "what the hell is that?"....
Followed by "OOh, they mean Lylat Wars"
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:16PM Drakkenfyre said
And "Lylat Wars" sounds goofy as hell to people who had it released under it's original name.
Even "StarWing" (the original Star Fox's name in European countries) was better than that.
Reply
Even "StarWing" (the original Star Fox's name in European countries) was better than that.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 4:27PM spartalaughs said
I will be doing a barrel roll.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 5:19PM nusilver said
Seriously? No tanks or on-foot multiplayer? That was what made this game awesome to me - the ability to chase Arwings on foot and treads. Bullshit.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 5:32PM smartt said
...something different will make me blue
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:06PM Suichimo said
Something borrowed, something blue?
Is there a TARDIS cameo in the game or something?
Is there a TARDIS cameo in the game or something?
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 6:55PM Solais said
Why is it called Star Fox 64 if its not on the 64?
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:18PM Drakkenfyre said
@Solais
Because it's an enchance remake of Star Fox 64, which was named Star Fox 64.
xxxsam, I hope you aren't implying the Nintendo 64 wasn't 64-bit.
And "the last one" should be cleared up. There has been 3 Star Fox games since Star Fox 64.
Reply
Because it's an enchance remake of Star Fox 64, which was named Star Fox 64.
xxxsam, I hope you aren't implying the Nintendo 64 wasn't 64-bit.
And "the last one" should be cleared up. There has been 3 Star Fox games since Star Fox 64.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 8:56PM spartalaughs said
@gbhifds7a9 Unless you're selling SF643D, we don't care.
Posted: Jul 22nd 2011 10:55PM KGameLover1 said
NOOOOO I WILL NOT BE BUYING THIS NOW FUUUUU
Oh wait, the multiplayer originally was terrible, now that I think about it, (Nah, this game is boring, let's go back to Goldeneye! (Yeah!)) and...
I don't have a 3DS anyway. One or two titles is not enough to justify a system purchase, no matter how great they both are. You know which two I'm talking about.
Oh wait, the multiplayer originally was terrible, now that I think about it, (Nah, this game is boring, let's go back to Goldeneye! (Yeah!)) and...
I don't have a 3DS anyway. One or two titles is not enough to justify a system purchase, no matter how great they both are. You know which two I'm talking about.
Posted: Jul 24th 2011 8:46PM VideoGameParadise said
I think it is awesome that they are trying to bring back the N64 game concept even if it is handheld. Some of the best games were released on this console. It also gives developers another shot to create at this level.
Posted: Sep 28th 2011 12:41PM lisacadre23hotmailcom said
Who doesn't love firefox, Firefox 64 bring up warm memories for anyone?
http://www.napoliclassics.com
http://www.napoliclassics.com








