| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (46)

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:36PM Credge said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
In other words, when people finally play their character all the way through Act 1 and have only made two decisions about their character (class and the 6 skills) and have not done anything else (spent stat or skill points since both are automatically spent for you) they're going to revamp their systems again, and again, and again instead of just going back to what works.

Either that or they'll say "WELL, YOU GUYS JUST WAIT FOR ACT 2 TO GET RUNES!" and the game will come out and not be as fun as it could have and then in the expansion they'll give us the ability to customize our characters how we choose.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 8:33PM Death Threat said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Credge After what i've learned about this game (permanent online connection required, in-game store that allows sale of items using real money, mod support is not just disabled, it's BANNED) and what they have said regarding the players (that we are no diffrent from gold farmers), Blizzard can take this game, and shove it up their collective asses.

Just in case people think i'm bullshitting:
http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/08/01/diablo-3-cannot-be-played-offline/
http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/08/01/diablo-3-will-let-players-buy-and-sell-items-for-real-money/
http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/08/01/diablo-3-mods-expressly-prohibited-by-blizzard/

Don't buy this. For the love of GOD don't buy this.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 8:52PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Death Threat

Still buying it. I don't care about mods for a game like Diablo and the auction thing is a complete non-issue IMO. You could buy items off places like eBay in Diablo II, so in practice almost has really changed other than Blizzard takes a cut of the auction. I'm against DRM on principle, but in this case I'll never see it. If you're playing Diablo offline you're doing it wrong.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 9:38PM hensothor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Death Threat

I'll buy the collector's edition, and two extra for great gifts. :)
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 10:28PM Death Threat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Vidikron Some people want to play single player. Some don't have the greatest internet connection. Some people have a laptop and travel about. Just because you will stick online all the time does not mean all others will.

And if we are calling Ubisoft on their DRM, then we have to call Blizzard on it too. Otherwise, sure is doublestandard in here.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 12:13AM Syndicated01 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Death Threat Except that's not entirely true, Ubisoft has said DRM in a game where the main draw is the single play (AC2: Brother Hood, From Dust). Blizzard puts it in a game where multiplayer is the main draw and where a real cash auction is in place. Do you see the difference yet? Offline game with crazy online restrictions, Online game with restrictions to prevent cheating.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 3:30AM GPrime101 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Syndicated01

Your argument makes sense, but I've never viewed the Diablo series as multiplayer focused. The first game had multiplayer almost as a bonus, mostly due to limited technology. The second's feature were much more robust, and there were spells and such designed to be more effective in a party, so there were some incentives for playing multiplayer, but it wasn't like you would never be able to finish the game going solo.

I've just never thought of multiplayer as the main focus of the series, because of how rich the single player experiences were. And maybe that's changed with D3. And even though there are many people out there who will buy the game... I won't be. Simply because my internet connection isn't stable enough for me to justify paying for a game I probably wouldn't be able to play consistently anyway. And that honestly makes me sad.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 7:44PM GPrime101 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@GPrime101
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:39PM Scott Pilgrim said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Rob Prado recently said the game was completely done all the way to Diablo and everyone that works at Blizzard can play it.

I just hope they don't release it on the same day as Skyrim or The Old Republic.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:55PM SirUrza said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Scott Pilgrim They're waiting for Old Republic. If EA/Bioware is smart they'll release it a week before Blizzcon so that Blizzard can't announce a D3 release date at Blizzcon.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:03PM stamps79 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Scott Pilgrim TOR and Skyrim are on my radar as well.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:43PM heroftime said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Alright, June 2012 it is then!

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:44PM HedonisticKai said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is there a TL:DR or just the topic?

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:44PM CARmakazie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh my god, not ANOTHER game I need to buy this holiday!!

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:46PM SpishackCola said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wait, so we're going BACK to betas actually being about fixing stuff instead of marketing? Ok, who turned the car around?!

Anyway, I'm so desensitized to the Blizzard "soon" response that I'll just sit back and chill until I see a link for beta signups.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 10:59PM Peffse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpishackCola
Diablo 3: Taking two steps forward and three steps back.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 6:47PM thedisagree said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
calling it, Feb 2012.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:06PM ShadowXIII said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Chances are it won't make it....and with all the ridiculous changing, (Online constant DRM/no LAN/Ebay), I don't want it anymore.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:57PM sleepwheel said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ShadowXIII yup me too. i suddenly don't feel the urge to care about diablo iii anymore since the announcement that it's online only.

to blizzard: "Oh, sugar, you just gone and done the dumbest thing in your whole life." (sin city quote)
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 7:02AM JessMeNU said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@sleepwheel Agreed, I was going to go all out on Diablo 3, my mostly highly anticipated game of the last decade.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:06PM Nook said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does this mean I can go to sleep at night, knowing that somewhere out there, some people are grinding away on D3?

Awesome. Can't wait to read the future post where employees come out about the grinding for this title.

I know, I know...they treat their employees good, this is Blizzard after all. Not like Kodick has any kind of say.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 9:44PM hensothor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nook

*Pst*

They've been grinding hard for awhile, by choice. They really want this game out, and they did EVERYTHING they could as a team to get it out this year.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:07PM Slomoshun said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Guys guys..

The game is finished. They're just trying to cut it up cleanly in segments that they can release later as "expansions".

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:09PM Slomoshun said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
"If you want Diablo 3 sooner than later, our advice is to join the beta and leave effusively positive feedback. It's a fool-proof plan!"

He acts like anyone can do it.

It's FREAKING RANDOM FFS

And please tell me how they're going to test the AH in a beta. Nobody is going to fork up real money in a beta to test the AH.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:25PM oolzie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Slomoshun
"And please tell me how they're going to test the AH in a beta. Nobody is going to fork up real money in a beta to test the AH."

really? you really can't think of ANY POSSIBLE WAY they could test it without people using their own money? ...
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:26PM DeadInside said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Slomoshun
"Nobody is going to fork up real money in a beta to test the AH."
Exactly what I was thinking. Oh noes my money went down a black hole! Blizz: Sucks to be you. Put more money in.
And this game isnt as complicated as they are making it sound. Its just clicking on stuff with 4 player multiplayer. Its not a full on mmorpg. Sometimes they just shouldnt say anything.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:56PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@DeadInside They got rid of single player, so it might as well be an MMO.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 8:56PM Vidikron said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Faceless Troll

Diablo is nearly pointless offline IMO. It's a game meant to be played online with other people that just happens to also support solo play (i.e. it's a MP game with SP tacked on).
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 9:01PM DeadInside said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Faceless Troll
Its still single player, always has been, always will be. There is co-op multiplayer and PVP too. There is no town with a million player characters running around like WoW. The only player characters you will see in your game are the ones you invite in.

From sticky FAQ
http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=27800569797&sid=3000
Q: Can all gear be obtained by solo playing?
A: Yes. All content is accessible in single player. This includes gear, skills, quests, and all other aspects of the game.
Q: What are the in-game benefits of playing in group?
A: There are no direct benefits from playing multiplayer. There are no items, quests, monsters, or anything else that is exclusive to multiplayer. The only real difference is getting to play the game with other people. There may be some indirect benefits like larger access to items since each player gets their only loot and can trade it with you. There is also the possibility of increased leveling speed by being able to kill harder monsters quicker.

Good info here too:
http://www.diablofans.com/
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 9:51PM hensothor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Slomoshun

They aren't testing the real money auction house... They are testing the gold one. I'm sorry, but duh! It gets the same server-side testing across, but has none of the other issues.

It does mean the balancing of real money goes untested, but Blizzard will and does patch often so that'll be taken care of post-launch quickly.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:19PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Diablo III can't come out this year, for the simple fact that I have no time to play it.

Don't do this to me Blizzard. Summer 2012 would be a better time.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:34PM Zetro said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sweet damn news! Its probably getting released Q1 2012 woot woot!! So glad Blizzard isn't busting another SC2 release wait.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:36PM gangcar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This comment was obviously made by some time-traveling employee at Blizzard, who's disoriented from his trip and still thinks he's in the year 2017.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:45PM Khalus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
In other words:

Blizzard: "Diablo III is damn near complete and ready to launch ~ as soon as Bioware announces a release date for SW:TOR. Then we'll announce a release date that is a few days earlier...!"

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 7:57PM SgtDookie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I bet that the real money transaction part of the auction house has a big part to play about why the game is taking so long to get ready.

I would prefer that Blizz just scraped that idea so the game would take that much time less to get ready for retail.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 8:43PM ironneko said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
My interest in this game dropped to nil after the recent announcements. I'll just go play Torchlight 2 whose devs don't assume we're all pirating sheep who need to be parted from our money in the most varied of ways.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 10:27PM Vuvuzelas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ironneko The butthurt is strong with this one
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 8:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ironneko Because no body bought and sold items for real money in diablo 2. Never. Never at all.

http://d2items.com/?gclid=COav06XQtaoCFcVO4QodVhax6Q
http://d2legit.com/?gclid=CPGSnabQtaoCFQJO4QodUnEb4w
http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=diablo+2+items

Not quite sure what those dodgy looking sites are doing...trading items for money? Nah, can't be. But they look trustworthy. Most Certainly its all a lie and none of those sites exist, because trading items for money never happened in Diablo 2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 9:33PM fdisk said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
In other words they are going to coincide the release of Diablo 3 (Or its Open Beta) with the release of the biggest threat to WoW so far (The Old Republic). Oh Blizzard...u so evil!

They've done this many times before, releasing major updates and expansions to coincide with competing games like LOTRO.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 9:39PM ShadowXIII said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@vnjufouds9a

^ See this?

This is what to expect in Diablo chat with the new "auction house".

Calling it now.

Posted: Aug 3rd 2011 10:27PM Death Threat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Some people want to play single player. Some don't have the greatest internet connection. Some people have a laptop and travel about. Just because you will stick online all the time does not mean all others will.

And if we are calling Ubisoft on their DRM, then we have to call Blizzard on it too. Otherwise, sure is doublestandard in here.

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 9:11AM Codeman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just wish they didn't announce the game SO early in development. I know Blizzard takes it sweet time polishing, but almost 3 years of polish is a long time to keep the fanbase waiting.

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 9:43AM PercyChuggs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know why this is news. Everyone here is going to boycott the game because of the always-online DRM, right?

Right?

Yeah, I didn't think so. Talk is cheap.

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 12:01PM Dillagence said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Could there be any more cry babies in here? Yea sure, you're going to boycott the game for lame non game-play reasons. This post is about the release date, which shouldn't matter to anyone that is not going to buy.

You whiny douche bags will not be missed. For every vocally butthurt blog commenter, there are a hundred real diablo fans that can't wait to buy the game. No auction house, mods, or DRM is going to change that.

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 4:17PM Alph said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
These days it seems like Devs think they can win 'rep' by not setting dates and making delays in the name of 'a better game' but seldom do they actually produce such a better game than what could have been released without a delay.

inb4 d/b-fb

What I'm saying is, I'm all for 'till it's ready' etc mantra but realize that each time you delay and every month extra it takes... I expect it to be 'that much better' so you better deliver because come launch day I will not pull punches nor will I sit and accept anything but a flawless-a few MINOR bugs-game.

Of course this is assuming I decide to buy D3 anymore, lately the news around it has been pushing me away more than getting me hyped.

Posted: Aug 4th 2011 4:20PM iceveiled said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It will come out when it's ready, and not a second sooner.

Articles like this amuse me.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW