| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (70)

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:08AM Don Cheeto said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
hold on though, there was totally an APC or something in that map in the alpha

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:15AM Osmium said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Don Cheeto

Yeah I could definitely see an APC in those tunnels :P
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:21AM Mr Hett said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Don Cheeto

They took it out because they felt it gave attackers an advantage.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:19PM Jay Z said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mr Hett The attackers should have some kind of vehicle because the defenders love to hide in bushes.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:23PM AdamPflug said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mr Hett Maybe they did, but I rarely saw the attackers make it past the first stage in the alpha, and it wouldn't make it far into the tunnels.... I guess they did move the MCOM stations though to make it easier. I kinda miss the APC because it really transformed the battlefield. Also it gave people some reason to play the Engineer class.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:07PM Dreamscape said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Jay Z

Yeah, with all that *great* cover in the first area of Operation Metro, they truly have no need for hiding in the bushes...

You're probably one of those people who complains about defenders *camping* on rush.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:09AM Rubbishy Me said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*Stares at ubisoft*

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:10AM ItchyBarracuda said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"He added that DICE doesn't plan on making Battlefield an annual title,"

OH GREAT...LOOK AT HOW EXCITED I AM

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:27PM StarcasM said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@ItchyBarracuda Yeah, okay.. They're gonna do just like Activision:

Modern Warfare
Black Ops
Modern Warfare
Black Ops

Etc, Etc..

Battlefield
BF: BC
-Repeat..
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:43PM DigitalEmporer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@StarcasM

No, DICE are logical developers.
Its been what, almost three years since BF BC2? Now we are getting BF3.

Expect BFBC3 in 2 years minimum! They are not actispamvision.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:10PM HaVoK308 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DigitalEmporer

You know when Bad Company 2 shipped, right?
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 3:10PM fupayme said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 3:59PM Manifest37 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@fupayme

Wow, did you pay for the beta?
I was unaware you could judge a game before its final release.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:12AM pi4aama said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
It might be spam , but when the hell is Silent hill downpour is releasing in EUrope ? Is 2012 or winter 2011 ?

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:16AM Pr1mus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@pi4aama

Wow this is amazing! This is a whole new unprecedented level of stupidity! You though asking the question in the comments of a BF3 news would yield better results than a google search!
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:31PM pi4aama said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Pr1mus
Googled it and still I didnt found nothing useful.
Do you think that youre cool because youre insulting someone who is probably thousands of miles away ?
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:13PM Pr1mus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@pi4aama

Yes
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 4:20PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@pi4aama

@pi4aama

Man, that just came the f u c k out of nowhere. lol.
Reply

Posted: Oct 9th 2011 4:14PM SKYRIM111111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@pi4aama

Maybe its because you spelled it wrong.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:13AM Pr1mus said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Finally some comon sense. No annual release. Hopefully they can actually hold on to this and EA can't do shit about it.

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:13AM Nirvash Planeteer Power of Capt said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"DICE doesn't plan on making Battlefield an annual title"
I'm okay with this.

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
good to know their PLAN is not to make it a yearly thing.

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:18AM Milf Biggenson said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
""No studio can make an annual franchise by themselves," said Liu."

Has anyone told Beenox and Activision this? I think what Liu meant to say was "No studio can make an annual franchise by themselves that's worth paying $60 for." If Spider-Man Edge of Time was $20.00, people might buy it. $60? No. Never. Not unless you're insane.

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:25AM eat it said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Milf Biggenson

correct me if I'm wrong but the same studio made Assassins Creed 2, Brotherhood and will release Revelations. 3 great games in 3 years.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:39AM Pr1mus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@eat it

Possibly, but Ubisoft is kinda the execption, they have over 3000 people in the Montreal office, so i wouldn't be surprised they have 500 people on that game alone.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:46AM iceytoa1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@eat it
Not if you refuse to play any that aren't 1,2 and 3.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:27PM whylekat said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Eat it

The same 3 games pretty much. As great as they may be they're not too different from one another.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 2:15PM Cranky Penguin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@eat it Brotherhood really wasn't much different from AC2 except they added multiplayer. Plus Revelations isn't out yet so we don't know if it will be good, probably won't be dramatically different from Brotherhood.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:21AM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
caspian border is playable on pc now, you know that, right joystiq writer?

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:27AM RichardMitchell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

Friday is generally considered part of "this weekend," so yes.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:22AM TurbineTech said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Am I the only one who thought the beta was lame? I read that it was based on month old code and the actual shipped product would be different. If that IS the case why would you release a beta for people to make purchasing decisions with, and use old code? I cancelled my pre-order because it was not enjoyable to me.


Anyone else feel the same?

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:25AM sammo21 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TurbineTech yeah, because of how long the approval process is on XBox360 they put out older code across all of the consoles. That's why the PC beta is getting more stuff and updates faster and more frequently. This code is at least over a month old.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:28AM Panzival said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@TurbineTech

I also cancelled my preorder. Both the game and battlelog were terrible
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:35AM Liegia said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TurbineTech No. This is a Beta, not a demo. It was never meant for players to use as an evaluation tool to decide if they wanted to buy the game or it; its purpose is to help DICE find errors and fix bugs as well as test out their backend hardware.

That said, I wasn't thoroughly impressed with the initial quality of the Beta software either. I am confident, however, that I will not be dissatisfied with my purchase of this game because the fundamental framework is all there. Once the bugs are ironed out (hopefully by release day) this has potential to be a phenomenal game.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:36AM Kbb81tn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TurbineTech
Yep. That'd be me. I'm not saying the game was crap but it certainly didn't meet or raise my expectations after playing it.
All that COD bashing had me expecting a lot more out of it.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:42AM TurbineTech said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@TurbineTech

With Arkham City, Uncharted 3, Skyrim, The Witcher 2 just around the corner and Rage and Dark Souls sitting on my entertainment stand I am just trying to be more responsible with my money. This is $60 I won't be spending on release day... Sorry DICE... :(
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:45PM StarcasM said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@TurbineTech Downloaded it the Friday after the release day, Deleted it off my XBox Sunday.. Or was it Saturday?

Too many glitches, no communication, weak texture on soldiers, Quicksand locations, spotty explosive radius, can't run at times, no teamwork, one map and Lag.

sound was great though as well as the backgrounds and crumbling buildings. But I can tell, if you're not playing with a "team", Expect frustration.

I'm not feeling the fact of playing a beta that played like a alpha. Seems like EA used this to get everyone hyped up for the game, but I personally think that worked against them. I'll be waiting for a substancial price drop before I make a purchase.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:47PM StarcasM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Liegia If that was the case, EA should have just put the beta out on PC ONLY. Putting old Builds on the consoles was a Big Mistake IMO..
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:57PM TurbineTech said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@StarcasM

I couldn't agree more. I was really looking forward to the "team work" experience. Something you don't normally get with COD, and its hard for people to cooperate when no one uses the mic. Very disappointing IMO.

I haven't deleted it yet, but that could be because I'm out of town.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who had grenades with absolutely NO kill radius.....
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:03PM HaVoK308 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Liegia

It does not matter what the intentions were. It matters how they were received by the general gaming public. You know...the people responsible for the majority of sales. Call it what you want, but I been gaming long enough to remember what a real beta is. This is a demo, by the sheer nature of it's marketing and hype. And it's how it was perceived by most gamers. It failed on all accounts.

Talking server loads? Test a small linear map with no vehicles? That makes no sense whatsoever. It was handpicked to appeal to the Call of Duty crowd.

The DICE defense force got their blinders on. I played every Battlefield game created, but I'm not blinded by personal justification and a sense of misplaced loyalty.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:07PM HaVoK308 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@sammo21

A month old? Try a year and a half. The game is done. No? There is a reason the fixes they claim to have taken place won't happen until you download the patch day one. Every BF game has shipped in poor shape. And it has always taken months before all major issues get fixed.

FYI...Sony has there own certification process. If MS held up the process, the PC would not be getting the Caspian map this weekend. If they wanted all platforms to have the same shitty "demo".
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:11PM Klearwater Killer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Panzival
Well, we sure will miss you. My battlefield experience just wont be the same without another whiney geek.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 7:13PM Vuvuzelas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Liegia putting out a complete turd will reflect negatively on the game

whether or not it was meant to do it, it definitely will lose sales
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:22AM Mr Hett said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Hopefully the next Battlefield title will have more game modes.

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 1:10PM JasonA said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Mr Hett

Not sure why you were voted down.

The lack of game modes in the recent Battlefield games is pathetic.

I'm not saying I want the number of modes in COD games, but there are sooo many types of cool modes you could imagine for this game that more than 2 or 3 modes would be nice.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 2:01PM Duke said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mr Hett
He was voted down because everyone else knows that this game has more modes. It is a beta of one map and mode only.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:24AM MatthewMk2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Bad Company 3 had better happen. If not, why the hell did they end the game on a clifhanger?

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 11:26AM Emil Muzz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@MatthewMk2

I agree. BFBC2 is a great game.

I hope for many more.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 12:29PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MatthewMk2

it *DIDN'T* leave the game in a cliff hanger... the end actually tied into the multiplayer part of the game when Russia starts taking over land all around the world.
Reply

Posted: Oct 7th 2011 3:50PM arucious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MatthewMk2
Plane....hanger...
:3
Reply

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW