Warren Spector says reviewers 'misunderstood' Epic Mickey's camera
66
Though plenty of reviewers (our own included) were swept up by the enchanting world of Epic Mickey, its shoddy camera has been pretty much universally maligned. Creator Warren Spector leaped to his team's defense while speaking with MTV, saying, "First, there has never been a game that I couldn't break if you give it to me for 30 seconds. I mean, I will break a camera in any game ever made. [Ed.'s note: Well, clearly.] Third-person camera is way harder than I even imagined it could be. It is the hardest problem in video game development. Everybody gets it wrong. It's just a question of how close to right do you get it."
Spector went on to claim that the issue stems from the fact that his game isn't a pure platformer, so the camera couldn't be tuned just for that purpose. "If reviewers want to give us a hard time about it because they're misunderstanding the game we made, it's not for me to tell them that they're wrong," he continued, "absolutely not."
Listen, we love Warren Spector, and Epic Mickey has plenty of good points, for sure. But "We tried to do something that was crazy hard and it didn't work" is not a suitable excuse -- unless you're going house to house and explaining the "right" way to play. (P.S. If Spector does start doing that, you probably shouldn't let him near your cameras.)
Spector went on to claim that the issue stems from the fact that his game isn't a pure platformer, so the camera couldn't be tuned just for that purpose. "If reviewers want to give us a hard time about it because they're misunderstanding the game we made, it's not for me to tell them that they're wrong," he continued, "absolutely not."
Listen, we love Warren Spector, and Epic Mickey has plenty of good points, for sure. But "We tried to do something that was crazy hard and it didn't work" is not a suitable excuse -- unless you're going house to house and explaining the "right" way to play. (P.S. If Spector does start doing that, you probably shouldn't let him near your cameras.)
Reader Comments (66)
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:04PM Xoonaka said
I think it's true, all cameras are pretty broken... must be amplified in a Wii game though, with no quick second analog stick camera controls to fix the issue. Most games I pretty constantly adjust the camera as I play, it's almost second nature... not sure how that would go on this title.
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:14PM Misfit Toy said
@Enosoma
Agreed. You'd think the programmers would play test that...
Reply
Agreed. You'd think the programmers would play test that...
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:48PM FriedConsole said
@Xoonaka
Agreed. I have never seen a 3D platformer not get critizised for its camera in a review. Its hard to tell if the camera is really bad or not while reading a review because some cameras are really bad and some aren't a big deal to fix every once and a while.
Reply
Agreed. I have never seen a 3D platformer not get critizised for its camera in a review. Its hard to tell if the camera is really bad or not while reading a review because some cameras are really bad and some aren't a big deal to fix every once and a while.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:49PM GMUHistorian said
@FraGNeM
No way, I think most people play GTA with the camera tilted a little bit downward when driving.
I agree with Xoonaka about the Wii's control scheme perhaps making the camera issue a bit more than it is on other consoles. Except for Mario Galaxy all of the other examples posted so far of good cameras are of games on other consoles.
I'm not saying that it's the Wii's "problem" though. If Spector or any other developer are going to make a console exclusive game its their job to figure out how to make the console's specs work the best in their game.
I also don't know why Spector's trying to hit back at reviewers. It doesn't serve a purpose and it just makes him look like a jerk. Epic Mickey seems to be selling well right now (#5 in video games at Amazon; no NPD numbers yet.)
Reply
No way, I think most people play GTA with the camera tilted a little bit downward when driving.
I agree with Xoonaka about the Wii's control scheme perhaps making the camera issue a bit more than it is on other consoles. Except for Mario Galaxy all of the other examples posted so far of good cameras are of games on other consoles.
I'm not saying that it's the Wii's "problem" though. If Spector or any other developer are going to make a console exclusive game its their job to figure out how to make the console's specs work the best in their game.
I also don't know why Spector's trying to hit back at reviewers. It doesn't serve a purpose and it just makes him look like a jerk. Epic Mickey seems to be selling well right now (#5 in video games at Amazon; no NPD numbers yet.)
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 5:04PM Mr Khan said
@Xoonaka
The only limitation the Wii brings to the picture is that it can't be moved dynamically as easily, but that's not the camera's main problem in that game at all
90% of the time when you really need the camera to move, it refuses to. In all of those cases, even the first person mode fails.
Reply
The only limitation the Wii brings to the picture is that it can't be moved dynamically as easily, but that's not the camera's main problem in that game at all
90% of the time when you really need the camera to move, it refuses to. In all of those cases, even the first person mode fails.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:36PM SimpleGame said
@Pugnaciousturtle
Maybe we're holding with Wii wrong.
Reply
Maybe we're holding with Wii wrong.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 4:09PM Shockwave said
@ironneko
Ahh Lair. The crappy flight game for PS3 we all wished was Rogue Squadron 4, but wasn't.
I remember that booklet. What was it? The reviewers guide or something or other. Telling reviewers how they were idiots, and how everything they hated was actually meant to be like that, so it was good.
Factor 5. The only company that proved that releasing sequel after sequel and not original IPs is a good thing, not a bad thing.
Reply
Ahh Lair. The crappy flight game for PS3 we all wished was Rogue Squadron 4, but wasn't.
I remember that booklet. What was it? The reviewers guide or something or other. Telling reviewers how they were idiots, and how everything they hated was actually meant to be like that, so it was good.
Factor 5. The only company that proved that releasing sequel after sequel and not original IPs is a good thing, not a bad thing.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:07PM Drakkenfyre said
Why is it, no matter how good a game is, or how bad a part of it is, the developers always say "People misunderstand it" ?
I haven't played the game, so I can't say how bad the camera is, but if it's bad, it's bad. We have had 15 years of 3D games now, and we know what a bad camera looks and feels like. Don't try to pawn it off on people not "getting it". If the camera makes itself a pain in the ass, it makes itself a pain in the ass.
Reply
I haven't played the game, so I can't say how bad the camera is, but if it's bad, it's bad. We have had 15 years of 3D games now, and we know what a bad camera looks and feels like. Don't try to pawn it off on people not "getting it". If the camera makes itself a pain in the ass, it makes itself a pain in the ass.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:08PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said
These reviewers play games for a living. I'm fairly certain they can tell the difference between a good camera, and a bad camera.
Shifting the blame for your own shortcomings onto reviewers is just ridiculous.
Reply
Shifting the blame for your own shortcomings onto reviewers is just ridiculous.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:16PM sonicspike41 said
@sammo21
I also don't remember the camera being this bad in the Splinter Cell games or the Prince of Persia games. Even MegaMan Legends has a decent/good camera if I remember right.
If I actually went through my games collection I could probably find tons of other examples too.
Reply
I also don't remember the camera being this bad in the Splinter Cell games or the Prince of Persia games. Even MegaMan Legends has a decent/good camera if I remember right.
If I actually went through my games collection I could probably find tons of other examples too.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:12PM BlueRajasmyk said
As a developer, this is exactly the sort of attitude I despise. For shame, Warren.
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:39PM FraGNeM said
@blueskyv201
You're right that the camera does mostly work in those games, but it does so at the great expense of destroying any way for a player to meaningfully influence their view of the game world.
They can do some really neat things with the camera rigging, but sometimes (most of the time) I want to be able to view the game world more directly.
Reply
You're right that the camera does mostly work in those games, but it does so at the great expense of destroying any way for a player to meaningfully influence their view of the game world.
They can do some really neat things with the camera rigging, but sometimes (most of the time) I want to be able to view the game world more directly.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:27PM Pugnaciousturtle said
@Deegan Fool! Warren Spector doesn't "mess up"! Everyone just misunderstands his genius!
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:32PM Primate said
I would have respected him if he did say that they didn't get it right and next time would be better, but this... I don't know what to think. I've forgiven games for having flaws and I love Epic Mickey (the girlfriend WAY more than me), but man... that camera... it has caused me to actually yell at it. I don't know if I have ever done that before in a game. The biggest disappointment out there is that there are games which are horrible but have decent camera control.
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:34PM Arkanaloth said
Like most here I can think of quite a few 3rd person games with stellar cam control. I think this guy's just making excuses. Then he goes on to make an absolute statement, saying he can break the camera in "any" game "ever" made.
The validity of such a statement is in doubt, and even if it *is* true the real question is how easy or difficult it is to "break" said cameras.
Reply
The validity of such a statement is in doubt, and even if it *is* true the real question is how easy or difficult it is to "break" said cameras.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:35PM greycolumbus said
This is a disappointing read.
Warren Spector has been giving the vibe that the game was polished and structurally sound. Mario Galaxy and Sunshine would get brought in conversations of the game prerelease. Both those games managed the limitations of a third person platformer with a smart, dynamic camera. I would have thought if there was one thing to ape from Mario, it would have been the basic mechanics.
Instead, the camera just feels lazy and at times simply broken.
Reply
Warren Spector has been giving the vibe that the game was polished and structurally sound. Mario Galaxy and Sunshine would get brought in conversations of the game prerelease. Both those games managed the limitations of a third person platformer with a smart, dynamic camera. I would have thought if there was one thing to ape from Mario, it would have been the basic mechanics.
Instead, the camera just feels lazy and at times simply broken.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:44PM Coldplay619 said
I never had camera problems in games where they give you complete control of the camera like in Epic Mickey :X
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 2:50PM Deezul AwT said
Nothing bothers me more than when a dev says, "You're playing the game wrong."
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 3:05PM Hawaii Jeff said
Pathetic whining.
The camera issues would have come up all the time during playtesting, but they chose not to do anything to make it better.
They would have had a discussion about it, and determined "eh, it's good enough to ship"
They justly deserve the criticism.
Reply
The camera issues would have come up all the time during playtesting, but they chose not to do anything to make it better.
They would have had a discussion about it, and determined "eh, it's good enough to ship"
They justly deserve the criticism.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 3:15PM The Albatross said
The Camera in Epic Mickey is supposedly pretty broken [I haven't played the game]. Explaining this away by saying that every 3rd person game has a broken camera doesn't work, because few reviews universally pan a game for its camera... where as, every review did so for Epic Mickey.
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 3:24PM TheManEl said
Well, sure, my patient lost his leg, but he's alive, isn't he? This was a pretty hard operation. And look at Dr. Johnson over there, he didn't do that great of a job either. I'm sure I can give his patient his broken leg back if I try. Give me 30 seconds and I will break his leg.
Everybody gets it wrong. It's just a question of how close to right do you get it.
Reply
Everybody gets it wrong. It's just a question of how close to right do you get it.
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 3:42PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
Can't stand someone who projects their insecurities on other people. I'd have respect for him if he had said "we did our best to implement a functioning camera and obviously we came up short. We'll learn from this and do better next time." instead of ... The camera doesn't suck, YOU suck.
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 4:03PM antiZER0 said
Mr. Spector, that's programmer bullshit. If your programmers can't design something don't say, "I cannot design for your requirements so your to blame." Everyone's more aware of the real cause for bad design, recycled code, and lazy evaluation and playtesting.
Reply
Posted: Dec 8th 2010 4:08PM KobaltKode said
Man I am kinda disappointed in everyone's responses...A good chunk of the people commenting, probably complain about customers they work for. It's really easy to sit back and criticize someone else's work from a distance knowing very little if anything about how it is done or the level of difficulty involved.
I understand that the way he went about it wasn't very tactful...But at least he has the guts to stand behind his team and defend his work. the responses are just as "classy" as you seem to think he is.
Reply
I understand that the way he went about it wasn't very tactful...But at least he has the guts to stand behind his team and defend his work. the responses are just as "classy" as you seem to think he is.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
Persona 3, Tactics Ogre, and other PSP RPGs that will live on my Vita
Posted on Feb 22nd 2012 5:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Rumor: Japanese Vita devs jumping ship, Sony responds 124 comments
- Buy 2 get 1 free on select Vita games at GameStop starting today 114 comments
- Sony's Rohde: proprietary Vita cards 'completely necessary' to combat piracy 112 comments
- Sony: Call of Duty blasting onto Vita this fall 89 comments
- Asura's Wrath review: Wrecking the curve 84 comments








