| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (46)

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:07PM Billlop said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I thought Metro 2033 was epic. An awesome game. I loved the moments where you were in the settlments. It was really immersive. Being taken by that prostitute then having all my bullets stolen really added to the immersion.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:13PM Jerk Face said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Billlop

That was what made the game so good. It just felt like a living, breathing world. Very Bioshock-like, in that respect - like the setting was just as much a character as the people living in it.

So if 2034 gives us more of that, and fixes the wonky shooting and gets rid of enemy animations that leave them invincible.. well, damn! Sign me up!
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 1:44PM The angry pro consumer gaming ga said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Billlop Relax buddy, the game was far from being epic. I liked the atmosphere, but fighting the same monsters over and over again got boring quick. Singularity was much better than Metro, hopefully 2034 will fix things and get things closer to epic status.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 2:43PM LENSconcept said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Billlop

Even with it's flaws, 2033 was my favorite game of 2010. Can't wait for the sequel.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:08PM FriedConsole said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
PS3 release for sequel?

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 1:29PM Uncle Jesse said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@FriedConsole

You'd think the first one (and the coming sequel) would have been on the PS3 to help overall sales, but maybe keeping the development costs down led to the decision of no PS3 version? Not sure.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:11PM Jerk Face said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I really enjoyed Metro, despite its flaws; so to hear that they're really supporting the sequel and giving 4A Games the time to polish it up makes me even more excited for its release!

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:12PM soniccar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The sequel might be better than the first one? The first one really was an awesome game. It had some nice little touches that really helped to immerse you, like the wind moving your rifle while aiming.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:17PM HaMmOdY said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
All I can say is I should've read the novel instead of wasting $45 on the game.
I'm not saying the game is bad it's good but the story progress isn't that good especially the ending.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:17PM Drakkenfyre said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I thought "badly coded" was the problem.

"Hey. toss the highest-end hardware at this thing, and it still runs like crap!" isn't exactly the same as "wasn't properly nutured".

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:21PM Billlop said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Drakkenfyre

Really? I have 2 gigs ram, 3 ghz Dual Core and 8800GTX but it runs like butter on max settings
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:24PM hyamzy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Drakkenfyre

My rig is an old £500 budget build but it ran maxed at 1440x900 smoothly.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:25PM Drakkenfyre said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I was using hyperbole.

Just like Crysis, the engine isn't properly optimized, so requires hardware far above what it should.

When seeing benchmarks of hardware that are far above the recommended specs, and seeing it pull in 40 FPS, that tells you something.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:59PM Billlop said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Drakkenfyre

That the human eye cant see more than around 30fps? Yeah, it tells me that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 1:33PM Assmar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Drakkenfyre

I think he was talking about the DX11 version of the game, which looks brilliant, but runs like dook. It's true, you wouldn't know because the 8800gtx isn't a DX11 card. There isn't a card or two card combination today that will prevent your minimum frames well below 20FPS.

I'm not saying the game is terrible at all, but the man has a point about it running poorly on the REAL "max" settings, wouldn't know how well the DX9 version runs. I know i've no clue about what I'm currently typing, but BFBC2 runs in DX11, and it effing swims on my machine. I'd rather have DX11 used to improve performance like Battlefield and WoW, if the games are going to look that pretty anyway. I'll take tesselation when the machines can properly run it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 2:01PM Unknown said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Assmar
I ran the game on the second highest setting on a GTX460 1GB with 6GB RAM, didn't really see any stutter or lag. Though I'm not sure if it was 60 FPS or higher, but didn't matter since it was good enough for the style of gameplay.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 2:07PM Drakkenfyre said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Billlop

Welcome to one of the most overused misinformation ever to exist.

The human eye's limit is per person. Some people can percieve 30FPS no problem, and can't tell the different any higher. Some people can tell the difference all the way up to 100 FPS.

The idea that the "eye can't see more than 30 FPS" is one of the most stupidest ideas ever to exist. Your eyes are not digital, they are analog. They don't measure information in frames. Anyone who has ever worked in computer hardware can tell you there very much is a difference between 30 FPS and 60 FPS.

I, personally, can tell when the framerate drops from 60 FPS to 55 FPS.

And no, higher framerates are not always about penis waving, it does make a difference in the smoothness of a game. Once you hit about 60, most games won't get any smoother, since even with VSYNC off the monitor is still limited to it's refresh rate, and the extra frames are just going to be sent to the monitor out of sync, and contribute to tearing. But once you drop below 60, you will notice it.

Please educate yourself.

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 2:17PM Assmar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Unknown
Well I DID post about the highest settings, not the second to highest settings, so there's that. But I'll just pretend to agree with you anyway.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:19PM hyamzy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's a coincidence, i just completed the game 5 mintues ago. AWESOME GAME!

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 1:25PM Mr Numeros said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@hyamzy
You mean 'solved that game tape 5 minutes ago.'
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:21PM Zolroy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I adored darn near everything about Metro 2033, so hearing that the sequel will be polished even more? Sign me the heeeck up!

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:22PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully Blockbuster sends me a copy that isn't scratched so I can make more than a token amount of progress in 2033, because I'm liking it so far. As it is I can't tell if the stutter I've experienced in the game was a result of the lack of polish or scratches on the disc. A sequel that's polished is almost certainly day-one though.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:26PM Gaming 4 Jesus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They're making a sequel?! Fantastic. Great game. Definitely a sleeper hit for me.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:33PM Doctor Otis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call me a cynic, but whenever I hear "polished", I think "dumbed down". Especially in relation to something from a PC centric developer. Polishin' down all the rough spots till all the depth is gone, and it's impossible to have any real glaring flaws, because the game really doesn't have much of anything left to BE all that bad anyways.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 8:23PM Invigilator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Doctor Otis

That's not a cynic. That's just not knowing what words mean.

Polishing means adding more gameplay depth, removing more bugs, making the experience better.

The word you're probably thinking of is "streamlining."
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 9:07PM Doctor Otis said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Invigilator Oh, no, I know the difference.

it's just when I hear polishing, that's usually what the result is.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:34PM Mylivingeulogy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really enjoyed metro, I hope they give tons of love to the sequel and make it as immersive as the first game. it would be even better if your choices in the first game made an impact on the second.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:39PM KungFuChaosNinja said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Metro was so awesome. And it was inexpensive to make? Hmm, I say keep letting them do their thing, THQ.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:43PM KungFuChaosNinja said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@KungFuChaosNinja

Btw, I really like Danny Bilson. He actually knows what he's talking about. He seems very involved, unlike a Bobby Kotick or something.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:43PM FakeJamaican said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
an underdog of a game. Needs better aiming/shooting and a chance to use an array of melee weapons. Metro 2033 was a great start. Reminded me a lot of the Darkness - and how that too was a great start with great ideas that would benefit from a sequel.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:44PM ewright said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I too just finished this game (on PC) and it was rad. The visuals were top-notch, the story was compelling, and the sense that I was in a desperate situation was real. e.g. how should I expend my precious bullets?

Recommended!

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:46PM PercyChuggs said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Yes, Metro 2033. The First Person Shooter with the bad first person shooting. Bad stealth segments. Dumb "bullets as currency" system, and horrible enemy/monster AI. I didn't much care for it.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 7:39PM FuriousMailman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Cool.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:47PM kentuckyfried said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would've helped had there been a ps3 version.

Oh well, looking to pick this up on the 360/PC at the next sale.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 12:48PM Enosoma said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"it was product development and marketing"

Isn't that like... 99% of a game company?

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 1:26PM Mr Numeros said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one who for just a second pictures Rachel Bilson at the head of a large boardroom table when he reads a headline involving 'THQ's Bilson'?

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 1:42PM HardBoiled2009 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
weird this is in the PS3 section when it's not a PS3 game. but if the sequal comes to the PS3 i won't get it as Metro 2033 did grab my interest when i saw the review videos ( what i saw being played didn't make me say OMG I WANT THIS it was just a meh don't care )

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 2:47PM Nobledevil Gaming Optimist said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game had small issues, but taken as a whole it was a brilliant game, and I am ecstatic to see a sequel. I'd prefer a console release (my K/M skills are terrible and any PC shooter is awkward at best for me), but I'll take whatever they give me.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 2:49PM SaintV said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If this game had multiplayer, PS3 version and more love given to it by the devs I would have bought it. The problem is that there are better single player games to play.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 3:08PM Slight of Ham said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good, it was an awesome story, and a game that got way over-looked on most people's end of the year award lists

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 6:13PM Talos Izanagi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Give me more ghost sections that part of the game was scary and awesome. Instant death train I gotta love that.

Posted: Jan 14th 2011 8:22PM Invigilator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Controls.

Does your shooter have good controls? If yes, then worry about everything else.

If no, then your shooter will never be a huge success. COD4 revolutionized the industry with high framerate, low controller latency, and amazing controls.

Far Cry 2, Killzone 2, Metro 2033: all shooters that could have been so great if not for their horrific controls.

Either get the controls right, or don't bother. It's gamebreaker for a shooter of any kind.And on PC, too! You'd think the mouse and keyboard would be easy to make FPS games for, but somehow Far Cry 2 made it feel awkward as well!

Posted: Jan 15th 2011 12:26AM Zombie Gaz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Loved that damn game.

Despite the flaws it was awesome. Bioshock is probably my favorite game of the current console cycle and this comes as close as anyone to matching it.

Maybe this will be similar to the Mass Effect series. The first had some pretty crazy issues and the second became everyone's favorite due to refining.

Posted: Jan 15th 2011 6:58AM Vector Scalar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tried to get this game from Walmart.com when they had the 360 version for $20, but they cancelled the order on me because they're unable to handle simple inventory. If it is as good as some of you feel, maybe I should pony up a bit more and get it anyway.

Just not from Failmart.

Posted: Jan 15th 2011 1:46PM Whiskey Tan9o said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please expand Metro 2034 to the scope of Fallout or STALKER! I would love to travel the metro tunnels and above ground of Russia and explore all of the wastes in it's glory! I can't wait and see what 4A does with the sequel.

Posted: Jan 17th 2011 8:39PM El Centenario101 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was thinking bout buying it but read a lot of bad or mediocre reviews so skipped it, it reminded me of fallout so thats what caught my interest

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW