| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (120)

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:30AM Cleric said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"though we're not sure how virtually slapping a "manic" female could be spun in an inoffensive way."

make it a male. then it'll be magically okay

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:47AM Captain Planet Planeteer Power said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cleric

Or if the babe in question is ugly, it'll be okay.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:47AM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cleric
or turn the slap into a bullet wound and again, it magically becomes ok.

Turn it into a kiss or sex, and it'll become 10 times worse than a bullet.

Magic. It's real.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:50AM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Captain Planet Planeteer Power

Or fat.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 11:47AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cleric

What if you slapped a gay man?

I went there...
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:23PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz well yeah that would be worse, that's called rape.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:23PM ecliptic said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Uncle Jesse

Hahahhahahahaha I went there he said lol
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:24PM Jenks said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cleric

Make sure the man is white, otherwise you're just jumping from sexist to racist.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 2:03PM Bighouse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheDarkWayne

So sex is rape? I worry about the intimate side of your life.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 3:19PM Faceless Troll said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Uncle Jesse There are no gay men in Duke Nukem's world.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 3:45PM Mr Bundy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Faceless Troll

In comparison to the Duke is everyone gay!
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 3:59PM XaiaX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mr Bundy
No one that excessively butch *isn't* gay. He's gayer than a christian conservative republican in a bathroom playin' footsie under the stall.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 4:16PM BananaBoat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Bighouse - What did you think rape was? Of course it's sex, albeit non-consensual sex.

I think we are thinking about this mode all wrong. Do you remember the other classic game that allowed you to slap women? That's right folks: Goldeneye for the N64.

(Also, this game is one big misogynistic train wreck, and we're focusing on this one mode? It could be worse you know, the woman in question could be a stripper that has run away from Duke's favorite strip club, that has to be "put back in her place" by means of "slapping dat ass" and "making it rain". This is tame by comparison.)
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 4:23PM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TheDarkWayne
Rape is called rape. Sex is consensual and thus called sex. I don't ever hear someone say, "He had sex by rape". It's "He raped..." the "Victim was raped". Not "The Victim was sexed up by force of rape"

So, point taken but denied.

If I meant to have rape implied, I would have said rape. It's like saying captain obvious is obvious.
Reply

Posted: Mar 24th 2011 11:40PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz given that this situation is discussed in the context of the babe being carried as if a flag, slapped, and potentially hit with bullets, I feel pretty justified in assuming it would be rape.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:35AM Poor Tom said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I guess this is the sort of game you get just to see how outrageous it is. There might be some nostalgia factor too, but I never really played old duke games.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:36AM daevv said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"Smack my Bitch up"

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:53PM BigD145 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@daevv What next, "Knock my bitch up"?
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 4:19PM BananaBoat said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@daevv - That video...on MTV at night back in the day...c'est magnifique.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:37AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
This is nothing compared to the upcoming "Choke-A-Bitch" mode.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:49AM ObiBen8 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Uncle Jesse I sure hope that Wayne Brady is unlockable for that mode.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:52AM Getchow hands out my fries said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Uncle Jesse

Well if your avatar shows your reaction to that mode then I'm sure we've nothing to worry about.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 3:46PM Bumper said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Uncle Jesse

No. No. No. It's pronounced "Cho-ca-bo"....but why would a yellow ostrich even HAVE a mode in a Duke Nukem game, let alone a cameo? lol
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:38AM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Every game made has to have some sort of offensive add-on these days. It's a media thing.

If it gets too big they'll just remove it or rename it. Like calling Taliban "Offensive Forces".

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:44AM koehler83 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Ghen So The Duke will just start calling women the "Offended Forces"?
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:40AM Apakal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Video game slap =/= real life slap.

End of story.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:42AM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Apakal

Wait for the Kinect mode down the line.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:44AM Qehb said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@CaptainProtonX

Better have a co-op option.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:41AM alucard3000 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
So it is starting to look like maybe the actual game might not be all that good if they are already trying to use controversy to sell it.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 11:07AM baby sea tuna said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@alucard3000

I thought it was widely assumed at this point that it wasn't going to be very good and that people were only planning on buying it out of some weird sense of brand loyalty.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 11:22AM roarkkokoro said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@alucard3000

ummmmm... this is still Duke Nukem right? Whether or not it's good, it doesn't have controversial issues in it to sell games, it has controversial issues because that's what Duke Nukem games are about. Not sure if you've ever played some of the older ones, but they aren't just trying to stir up controversy, they're trying to be loyal to the source material. If they made a Duke Nukem game without nudity, extreme violence, offensive as hell commentary. etc. etc. etc. everyone would call foul.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 11:41AM Uncle Jesse said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@alucard3000

I still think the biggest story surrounding this game is that IT'S ACTUALLY BEING RELEASED! Seriously, no one would have guessed that Duke Nukem Forever would ever see the light of day after all these years.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:42AM Qehb said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It only looks bad when you pull it out of context, like most things.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:44AM CaptainProtonX said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
The controversy started nearly 15 years ago. No point in stopping that train now.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:45AM CaptainProtonX said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@CaptainProtonX

Meant as reply for Alucard3000 up above.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:45AM Vaancor said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
10 bucks says this gets remove or patched out due to complaints or legal team being afraid.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:47AM djpenny said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
so when the demo coming out lol

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:48AM MLC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow...

DNF is gonna be crazy. Lol. I can't wait.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 10:52AM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I refuse to take offense at slapping a woman in a comedic way when women are allowed to assault (kick balls) and slap men no matter what, and it's ok. For comedy or anything.

Yet, when a man looks at breasts or attempts any physical comedy with a woman, it's perverse and wrong.

Yeah... whatever. It's a two way street people if you want true equality and not less than equality.

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:38PM MLS said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz
There is no real math to comedy and what is too far. It's all about context, not the act itself. When they all line up to slap the lady in Airplane, it's funny. It's a nod to those 50's chauvinistic male lead tropes in films. It's also way over the top, with the whole line of people gag.

I'm not offended as some fort of feminist, only as someone who enjoys comedy. I's a lousy joke with no more meaning than "hah, he hit her", and frankly, this is the last thing a videogame needs right now. It's a culture drowning in negative stereotypes.

All the people that say "oh you just can't take a joke". I refuse to take it, because it's a lousy joke that shames me to admit to someone (especially a woman) that I like to play video games. South Park pushes the boundaries all the time, but guess who else did, Andrew Dice Clay. Only one of those two is funny.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:48PM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@MLS
If it were a man being slapped it'd still be a joke and no one would flinch. If it were a woman slapping a man, no one would flinch.

So I refuse your argument because, again, men can be treated like crap in EVERY context if it's a woman doing it. Explain that or even excuse it.

So, sorry, this isn't debasing to gaming or women. Only to those that find offense in something that isn't offensive. Especially in the culture where you can kill and maim someone and that's more tolerable than sex or "violence" against women.

It's always funny to kick a man in his balls, possibly forever destroying his chances at procreation, but it's never ok to look at a woman below her chin (even then it's offensive if she's "pretty") or use a woman for any sort of comedy unless the woman is the one committing the act on a man or another woman.

You can't pick and choose what's right for equality. True equality means this sort of humor isn't tolerable on any sex.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:51PM Qehb said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@MLS

You claim comedy is all about context,

then claim you are offended without ever seeing it in context...
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:52PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz I think MLS' point is less about the inequality of the act, and more that it's just not funny. If it were a woman slapping a man, it probably wouldn't be funny either
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:56PM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz
And I don't approve violence against women or anything that "desensitizes" violence against women. And I understand the argument against "media" portraying women in a negative light but it's mostly people making something out of nothing.

A woman can oggle a man and that's fine. She can want his "package" all she wants.

A man can never appreciate a woman's body or face. It's "chauvinistic", it's wrong.

If you want context to be brought in, it has to be brought in on both sides. This isn't a one-way battle.

If women really want equality they need to fix their perceptions on men just as much as men need to fix their on women and if you look at it, assuming the women is willing, women are always treated better than men. They're things of beauty whereas men are things of crime against nature and beasts.

A woman can say a woman is beautiful but a man can't say a woman or man for that matter, is beautiful.

Again, it's a two way street. Women need to stop blaming everyone while not addressing how they view men themselves.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 12:58PM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TheDarkWayne
I disagree. In plenty of movies and sitcoms you see this kind of comedy. 3 stooges? Almost every sitcom?

When someone is screaming hysterically, you almost always get slapped... Regardless of gender.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 1:18PM MLS said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Mmmmz

I cannot accept your "if". When that happens, you can bring it up, but you can't just point to an imagined parallel universe and say "it's ok with them!" This is the situation as it is, and it's embarrassing.

Embarrassing is the key word here. Like I said before, this isn't a sexism rant, it's a rant on shite humor that makes gamers look bad. Also, you can't try to call me out for choosing a side and saying it's only my personal opinion; then chose the other side and claim that to be the objective truth.

It's a dumb joke that embarrasses all parties involved. Not that I'd expect this game to do any better, or that I was going to play it anyway. Also, to the guy who guy who said I don't know the full context of the joke. You got me there; I am sticking my neck out a bit. Maybe there is something more to it that - oh who am I kidding? Something more to Duke Nukem? Hah!

The rest of your rant is going way off into this rabbit hole of what is sexist and what isn't. Not even worth talking about. Especially since I had already explained that off-color comedy thrives when done right, and that you CAN make those jokes if you've got the wit, which Duke obviously has never had.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 1:31PM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@MLS You really live in your own bubble it seems. Power to ya!
My "ifs" are happening every day and if you want to get smacked in the face with it, watch Lifetime "for women". It's simply offensive how they portray men. Almost every instance is degrading. It's also extremely degrading to women because it basically hypes every stereotype against them.

Why is this humor degrading and embarrassing in gaming when it's everywhere else? How does this define the genre? I chose the sexism route because I assumed that's where your perspective was. (also, not because you proclaim to be a woman). I simply don't understand your complaint to taking offense on this. I could totally understand you not finding it funny, but to say it's degrading and offensive, especially to gaming on the whole? Makes no sense to me.

You're letting it define the genre.

It's like saying porn is embarrassing to the movie industry. It makes no sense.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 2:25PM MLS said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Mmmmz
IT'S NOT HAPPENING IN DUKE NUKEM!

God, you are daft. As if slapping/spanking a women to win a videogame is comparable to some Lifetime TV movie. Two different forms of entertainment on two entirely different cultures. It is not applicable. Stop talking about everywhere else. Whether or not it works there, doesn't excuse it from not working HERE.

Also, no. Terrible analogy to pornography and film. Duke Nukem is being sold on the same shelf as Deus Ex, Portal 2, Katamari Damacy, Madden... It's going to be just as contestable for GOTY, and reviewed on all the sites just like every other game.

It doesn't work like that in the film industry. A more logical comparison would be like a Rob Shnieder movie.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 2:26PM guttertalk said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Mmmmz

Yes, the problem is that men are the majority of rape victims and have to be careful because who knows when 11 women might gang rape a man. Husbands are so physically abused by their wives that we have shelters across the country for them. And 70% of all serial murders are men.

Wow, you're right. It is a two-way street.
Reply

Posted: Mar 21st 2011 2:45PM Mmmmz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@guttertalk
Yep, a minority makes a majority!

If you think how women are portrayed in media affects these men who commit crimes then one has to admit that violence in general, not just against women, affects them.

But that's a less comfortable approach, isn't it?

Did you even try to understand what I am saying? This isn't all for one, or all for none discussion.

Men are abused by women, though. It's also vastly under reported. Is it an epidemic? I don't know or truthfully care, but it's not exactly the argument I am positing here.

Of all violent crimes, how many are men on men? Does it matter what the gender is? I mean, a violent crime is a violent crime and I do find it more offensive against a woman, but in reality no violent crime should be diminished just because of gender. It's all crap.

Also, the fact that people find it more offensive to be violent against a woman exhibits the deep stereotype that women are inherently weaker. Do you support that? Sounds like it subconsciously. We all do. We all want nothing to happen to women. We don't want them to fight for wars, we don't want sexual violence committed against them, but why outside of them being a woman, does it matter more?

THINK! about it.

I'm not saying our societal views need to change in those respects, but I DO think we need to actually admit where they're BASED.

Men are naturally stronger than women. Not always, but that's the majority, it's how our bodies are grown. It's human nature.

If we had another sub-human species where women were physically stronger in general to their male counterparts, but the same in every other way I'm sure there'd be a flip there.

Just calling it sexism isn't doing anyone any favors. It's ignoring some aspects of the issues.
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW