| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (33)

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:34PM Papa Neorev said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
damn that sux, my wife just loves the 1st one. Turned out to be a great way to enjoy some gaming with her.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:36PM Jawmuncher said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Papa Neorev
Yeah I don't see the reason why we can't have both.
Guardian of Light as a lot of fun especially in coop.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Papa Neorev Exactly the same situation here. So many games have online multi-player but fewer are designed to be as good in an offline multiplayer and even fewer for coop.

We had a ton of fun.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:25PM HaVoK308 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They must already be planning sequels for the $60 reboot. Refusing to make a sequel for an arcade game that received great reviews and was highly profitable is yet another example how disconnected developers/publishers can be.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:35PM Tihn said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
good. Guardian of Light was terrible and it felt like Lara was just dropped into it at the last minute. If it means more games like that upcoming one of theirs - then that's an even bigger GOOD.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:11PM Kitanishi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Tihn

Can I punch you? Pretty please, with a building? :/
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:26PM HaVoK308 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

He is clearly "all of the above".
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 8:37PM NiGhTHaWk830 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tihn

The core experience itself was fine, but just like the CD person says in the article, the whole way they handled releasing co-op was complete garbage, not to mention the co-op itself when it finally was released turned out to be garbage. CD lost a customer after that fiasco.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:39PM szimm said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
So - it was critically acclaimed AND profitable. What exactly does a game have to do these days to warrant a sequel then? Truth be told I would rather see entirely new concepts, but Guardian of Light was excellent and honestly revived the otherwise stagnant Tomb Raider experience for me. The new one (unimaginative title and all) seems set on doing the same. When I saw the presentation, I thought Tomb Raider survival horror - and I rather like that idea.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:08PM niggerlips20721 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@szimm
I'm not even a fan of the Tomb Raider series, and I loved the hell out of Guardian of Light. Not only was it critically acclaimed and profitable, but I'd imagine it got a lot of new people interested in the main series. I guess they just don't want Tomb Raider to become relevant again.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:54PM R Planteer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@szimm

1. Tomb Raider francise steadily declines in sales and quality for years.

2. Company relaunches new Lora Croft game that plays completely differently from the previous entries with a low development cost.

3. New Lora Croft game sells well and is widely hailed as being a very good game.

4. Company abandons new game type to return to the 1990s same old tired formula.

5.???????????

6. Profit?

I honestly cant think of anything beyond "market like crazy" to make #6 true. This is one of the stupidest things ever to come out of a company spokesperons's food hole.

"It was widely liked and sold well and we are completely uninterested in doing anything like that ever again.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:39PM ItsameMatt03 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That's too bad. That was just about the best $15 I have spent on an XBLA game next to Shadow Complex. Plus, it's one of the best co-op experiences that my brother-in-law and I have played in awhile. When we finished the game we both said that there needs to be another one.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:40PM ZexionArmando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thats a little depressing. I really liked LC&TGoL, and a sequel would have made me very happy, lol.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:41PM SgtDookie said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If the game performed well financially and they know now about things like online and such that they didnt before it just doesnt make sense that they would totally shut down the idea of a sequel.

I understand being focused on the next big installment of the TR franchise but it almost seems fishy that they would just close off the idea of a sequel.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:44PM Bluebreaker said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Something was financially and a critical success! Let's NOT make a sequel to it!

That's pretty shocking coming from a game company nowadays.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 5:56PM Courtney said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Okay, are some people in the industry just that disconnected from actual gamers? LC:GoL was simply a terrific game, and brought in tons of people who had no interest in Tomb Raider into the franchise, me being one of them.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:00PM radioactivez0r said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I agree with all these comments. Except Tihn, who obviously didn't play this excellent game.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:36PM sleepydumbdude said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guardians of light was the first time I liked Tomb raider since the second one. If they don't make a sequel wish they'd make use of another character with the gameplay type. I bought all those DLC character packs for it.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:42PM blackangel209 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think I can sort of understand why they would do this. Having 2 separate story-lines going at the same time for 1 character creates a bit of a disconnect and can sometimes confuse/alienate players. Or even having the story set up across different platforms(looking at you Kingdom Hearts >.>) including the difference between downloadable and physical disc. Not saying I wouldn't like to have another, but it just sorta makes sense.

Posted: Jun 11th 2011 10:59AM qrack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@blackangel209 Agree. With this new Tomb Raider putting so much emphasis on the characterization of Lara, releasing another game that portrays Lara completely differently would be counterproductive.

Who knows? Maybe they'll make another GoL style game, only without Lara as the lead. Kain and Raziel? Gex? What other IPs do they have that they could use? They already put a ton of effort towards perfecting that style of game. I seriously doubt they're abandoning it, completely,
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 6:51PM tendoboy1984 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get it. Laura Croft is Tomb Raider. Do they mean they aren't making any more spinoff games like Guardian of Light? What's the difference between that and a normal Tomb Raider game?

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 7:27PM Emperor Monkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It was the only Laura Croft game I've ever liked, and one of my absolute favorite games. Perhaps this reboot will bring the same level of quality and fun.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 7:42PM PN04 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They missed a great opportunity to finally shed the Tomb Raider title and call the New game "Lara Croft", which would have made more sense since it's focused more on her as a character than it is her boob size, but they just had to give that name away to a one off online game that they'll never continue... that's sad. Even if the new game is "better" it'll still have that stupid name that makes it feel out of place if she does anything other than tomb raiding.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 8:42PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's terrible news.

GotL was great fun for me as a gamer but also accessible enough that my wife could play it with me. We had a blast going through it together.

It really is my favorite XBLA or PSN game by a huge margin. In fact, the other day we were playing through the Dungeon Siege 3 demo and we really enjoyed that as well. But then I got to thinking, why is this game a $60 retail release and GotL was a $15 XBLA game? DS3 really just felt like a fun but still crappier version of GotL, and that's not a knock on DS3 so much as it is a testament to GotL.

Not only was GotL the best arcade game I've played this gen, it was better than most retail games. I really wish they were making a sequel. It was profitable and everyone seemed to love it. I don't know why that's something that wouldn't be pursued further.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 8:43PM Vcize said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Vcize

And I just wanted to add, I find the chances about 1 in 100 that I'll enjoy the new Tomb Raider "reboot" (what is this, the 3rd reboot now?) more than I enjoyed GotL. I'd much rather have GotL2.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 9:16PM SlyBeast said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dumbasses. They must hate money.

Posted: Jun 10th 2011 10:08PM wenchwogg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crystal Dynamics: The new TR looks great. However, make another Legacy of Kain game, thank you.

Posted: Jun 11th 2011 5:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When Tomb Raider first came out, I was under the impression that her name in the games title, you know Lara Crofts tomb raider, it seemed like it was an idea to make her a video game character that could be in other games, like Mario, but not Mario. Anyways I always had thought thats what she was but it never happened till this game, though not a stretch but this game was damn fun. They coulda down a reboot of tomb raider staring some other chick like Lara but not her since shes off uh doing the GoL thing.
I dont know, I just liked the co op in this game, I hope they at least revisit the game and maybe make a more spiritual sequel or something.

Posted: Jun 11th 2011 10:19AM Hyne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think this is a stupid move not to try another. They admitted it was very successful and so what if the co op didn't go well? Sure when I first heard about the game, the co op is what intrigued me and I did get a little bummed the feature wasn't going to be there immediately when I first purchased the game. You know what though? I played GoL anyway ALONE and it was a blast on its own. Maybe it was just meant to be played solo and the AI never gave me heartache because I was still in complete control and everything was responsive. Whatever mistakes happened in game was my own fault.

The Tomb Raider series has always been a hit and miss with me. I loved some of the games that have come out in its name and I have hated some as well. What bothers me though is how they've always had this strategy. Drop everything else that could be amazing and focus all their time and resources on dishing out another Tomb Raider.

I'm still taking the new Tomb Raider in with open arms because it does look good despite whatever little criticism I do have, but I'll still be disappointed with thought that that's will be all the company wants to push instead of having a quality game like GoL run along side it.

Posted: Jun 11th 2011 10:46AM Axcalibur said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Still really wondering why this needs to be a "reboot" and not just a "prequel".

In a reboot, you tell the fans of Tomb Raider that everything they've played before is to be erased and here is the new Lara Croft and all that she's about. If you know any Lara Croft backstory, then just erase that from your mind.

If it's a prequel, you tell fans that this is how Lara became the Tomb Raider, a sort of untold story of her past, but it will fit in with the continuity of the series.

In the event this is a prequel, this could potentially be a jumping off point for new gamers to enjoy this new Tomb Raider game, and then play the rest of the series. However, since this is a reboot, you're almost saying don't bother playing the other Tomb Raider games.

I have enjoyed all the recent Tomb Raider outings (including Lara Croft Guardian of Light) and I can't imagine why they would want to throw that all away to start the franchise over.

I say, call it a prequel and make the storyline fit with what we already know.

Posted: Jun 11th 2011 11:40AM qrack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Axcalibur Because the old TRs have a lot of baggage associated with them, good and bad. The franchise has stagnated, and many people dismiss it. Why would they want to stay associated with a continuity that no one outside of hardcore fans care about? This is their chance to remake things from the ground up and create a vision for TR that's their own and not something inherited from a studio that nearly ran the franchise into the ground.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2011 12:03PM Sc4rfac3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WTF? Do they not want money???

Posted: Jun 14th 2011 4:48PM NormanCod said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Shame. Guardian of Light was the best TombRaider game I played since the PS1. Unlike other tomb-based treasure-grabbing games, these puzzles seemed like proper puzzles, not just 'Jump to platform, pull lever, go through opened gate'.
Prior to this it felt like the genre hadn't moved forward since Knight Lore http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7243884507023050970#

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW