| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (71)

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:04PM cantwait2bhome said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Excited for another Smash Bros, I am, but the delay is certainly to be expected.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:26PM romevi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@cantwait2bhome I understand, Yoda.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:04PM adr916 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
since smash is finally coming out on hand held why not have pokemon finally come out on console!

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:41PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@adr916

Pokemon Snap?

Does that even count?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:47PM Rizraz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@adr916
Pokemon Stadium?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:56PM Epoque said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Pokémon Console RPG, that uses the same mechanics as the handheld main-series games.

Just give us Pokémon U & 3DS, with the same differences as the traditional 'Red & Blue' setup, have them cross compatible but still tailored to take advantage of their vastly different platforms. It would even give people more incentive to buy both versions, seeing as they could communicate between their 3DS and Wii U, playing on the road or at home. PLEASE!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:29PM EliminatorZigma said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@adr916

One that doesn't suck, you mean.

As in, I want a full recreation of the original Pokemon Red/Green, but on a console, with 3D graphics.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:29PM SpideyBR said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Epoque WOW. That's actually a GREAT idea.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:31PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Epoque

i have been praying for a Pokemon console game since Silver and Gold. Don't hold your breath, Like ever. If they haven't done one in 3 console gens, its never gonna happen.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 4:23PM KillaPat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell

Wtf do you even mean, "does that even count?"

Of course it counts. It's like the best game ever.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 5:50PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@KillaPat

I wasn't trying to imply that it didn't count. My comment didn't come out right. I should have said Doesn't it count?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:05PM A Sandwich said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, if the Wii U comes out next Christmas then that means Smash Bros. comes out about a year to two years into its lifecycle, which isn't too bad, really. I just wish they would apply the same character roster to Mario Kart.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:40PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@A Sandwich

That is if you assume either game will be completed in 2 years. If it was one game then yes but since its two titles on different platforms it could be more than just the two years. You also need to understand that Nintendo developers don't have any track record with working on HD games. On WiiU you also have the touch screen which will undoubtedly be used ... they have to figure out how.

This statement makes me worried:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"With previous projects I had a game design document in place before forming a team, but with this I don't have the time for that. I won't be able to look at every aspect of the game and balance out all the characters by myself this time,"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It sounds like he is saying they are basically going to wing it and fly by the seat of their pants. It also sounds like he is saying they have to get it right from the start because there won't be meaningful internal beta tests to re-balance characters.

They should hit up Capcom for some assistance in tweaking the character roster and making the game balanced.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:28PM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Totally with you on the character roster thing, that'd be phaaaat. Assuming people still say that, of course.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 10:32PM NewEraBlood said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MarkezJM You realize no one has used the term "phat" in years, right?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:06PM MrCheeks said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY UNDERSTANDING!

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:08PM ricorich196 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
DOA. I think Nintendo is shooting themselves over and over.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:20PM KaBob799 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ricorich196
Yes. I'm sure not being a launch title will kill one of Nintendos most popular series, despite the fact that both the original and brawl came out a couple years after their systems and sold well.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:36PM ColorblindMonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ricorich196
Elaborate. Why are you a nay sayer?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:47PM bm111 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@KaBob799

Nintendo is always doomed/dropping the ball/whatever, no matter what they do, even if it's a success. Duh.




(hey pssst, let the poor guy believe what he likes, bless his heart)
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:29PM ItsameMatt03 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ricorich196

Yep, Nintendo has shot themselves in the foot over and over. About 87 million times with the Wii and nearly 150 million times with the DS. What a failure.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:50PM ricorich196 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@ColorblindMonk First I think they announced their system much too early. Second the 3DS sales have not been anywhere near as good as the DS sales were. Then they keep rehashing the same series over and over, I grew up on Metroid for Gameboy and Zelda and Mario on SNES but times have changed. My little brother, 8 years old, who owns a Wii doesn't even know who Zelda or Samus is. It's almost as if they are still targeting my generation and I honestly feel that I've grown away from that stuff. Perhaps I'm the exception.

And I don't wish for Nintendo to fail or do badly, competition is what drives this market and what will drive Sony and MS to play harder (look at move and kinect for example, without the wii these devices would not exist at all.). I just feel that perhaps I'm not seeing their central vision with the Wii U.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:51PM ricorich196 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@bm111 I never said they dropped the ball with the Wii or DS, but I feel they have with the 3DS and may with the Wii U.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:55PM ricorich196 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@KaBob799 Well seeing as Super Smash Bros Melee was my only game for the GC for about 8 months, I can tell you that having this thing ready at or around launch can only be GOOD for the platform, if you think otherwise, shoot yourself over and over. Or have Nintendo shoot you over and over instead of themselves.

There's a meme in here somewhere I think.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 4:31PM KillaPat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ricorich196
People keep not only asking for those games, but expecting them. If they don't make them people get angry like with Pikmin and F-Zero. Why would they not make another Mario or Zelda game when pretty much everyone that owns the game's system will buy it?
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 5:53PM Soiden said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ricorich196

Maybe I wouldn't buy a Nintendo console if there is no Mario, Zelda or Metroid.

Do you know why they announced and showed the console THIS early? Because they want third parties to be involved with the console from much earlier. Maybe this time Ubisoft will offer something better than what Red Steel was for Wii, because of time.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:08PM HollywoodMontrose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Expected, yet still disappointing. Can't wait for a Smash Brothers with proper online!

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:08PM ShokLoc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Several years? At least they're being honest. Smash is the primary reason I'm going to get a Wii U, so I may hold out for it. :(

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:23PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering how much fan service they throw into Smash Bros. and the fact that they no doubt want some form of interaction between the Wii U and 3DS (training perhaps?) this really is only good news.

i mean, it's get a glorified port of the Wii version or wait it out for another, hopefully, epic release.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:44PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz

It would only be good news if he said they were holding out development to make the game perfect. He basically said they are going to rush both games to get them to market as soon as possible. There is nothing good about his statement in terms of the quality of the final product.

This is actually depressing news.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:52PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
Not really. All that comes off more as PR speak. Fans of the series are rabid and as long as they don't absolutely need a quick selling IP, relative care will be made with it.

That said, what else could you add to smash bros. besides a few more characters and another mode or two?

Not much.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:56PM Baron Samedi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz On the negative side the Wii U version will be dumbed down just so the 3DS can catch up. So he he's already saying they're not going to push the graphics or character roster for the Wii U so the two platforms will work together. Hopefully it won't be a glorified port of the Wii version but it's looking that way so far. Then again we have several years till release so who knows.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:02PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz

Except this isn't PR speak. This is the main man himself in a column written for famitsu. It's not a press release or Reggie on stage at E3. It's not carefully crafted or worded. Basically, its the truth.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:10PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz You tow the company line. He's trying to tamp down expectations from the start. Anything that is said right now is to be taken as a grain of salt. Basically if everything he says happens, he can say I told you so, if not he can come out on top looking like a savior. Again, PR speak. It doesn't just come from PR persons.

I'm not saying it will be "epic" but at the same time I doubt everything he says will be accurate by the time it's released. It all depends on time and how the development goes and where the platforms are when the time comes.


Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:31PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz

Agree to disagree. I'll take his word at face over your interpretation.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:39PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz
And thus an opinion is born. =P

Still, history precedes my opinion on the matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 1:59PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz

I don't agree that these comments have anything to do with him trying to lower expectations for either game. I think its just good old fashioned real talk ... something you don't see much of in the game world anymore.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 2:33PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
Well, yeah that's how I meant it. I can see how mentioning PR speak would point otherwise.

I mean, yeah he's being honest but at the same time he's being honest to tamp down expectations. However, knowing his work, if he has time he will do more if he can. And that time depends on how long Nintendo feels it can wait it out which in turn depends on how the market is treating the two platforms and what other games are available.

If it needs a killer IP and none are closer, than definitely, this will be rushed and neutered.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 6:15PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz

I guess what I'm saying is no matter how it's defined I would never consider his comments about smash bros as PR speak. He gave specific and detailed info ... On his own no less. I actually think it's a disservice to call it PR speak. No soft peddling or back peddling. Just ... Honesty. 

Pulled this off the web ... 

http://prbreakfastclub.com/2011/03/22/defining-pr/

Here is how I would define PR: “The practice of safeguarding a client’s reputation. Public relations can also be the driving force behind obtaining positive and effective publicity for an event or product.”

I think it's kind of funny / ironic I'm actually backing the developer and what he said verbatim and you are kind of trying to spin it. Just seems backwards.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 6:27PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz I'm viewing the situation realistically from a viewpoint that may, or may not happen.

Actions speak louder than words and only the future will say where it ends up but I don't hang on anyone's words. Especially developers/publishers. I go by precedence and likelihood

Devs say a lot of things and not much of it ends up happening as planned. For better and for worse.

Smash Bros has rabid fans. They wouldn't really tolerate a half-assed game except maybe on the 3DS because they're lusting over one so badly. And Nintendo depends on those fans a little more for the series than their other games.

Again, it all depends on how pressed Nintendo feels during the game's final stages.

So let's just wait and see what happens, shall we? No point in splitting hairs on future predictions that we have absolutely no control over.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2011 12:04AM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mmmmz

You are spinning again and you are actually taking his words out of context. First, go by his own pedigree and past performances rather than a generic look at the industry as a whole. The man has a sparkling reputation. Perhaps he will work even better with his feet to the fire. Just because he says there is a truncated schedule doesn't mean the game will be half assed. It should give some cause for concern and be worrisome but it feels to me that you are trying to spin what he's saying as to make it seem like he is just being a drama queen. In fact, what you have said is more in line with PR speak than what he was actually saying.

Give some relevant examples of this "precedence" you keep harping on. You make it sound like your interpretation is somehow more important / relevant than what the guy MAKING the game is saying.

It just looks like you are trying to make this out as a non issue ... This is the guy making the gaming going out of his way to talk about the upcoming process of developing these two titles simultaneously on two separate & new platforms.

In a weird way you are being both overly dismissive & extremely defensive. No one ever said the games would suck or be half baked so you don't need to try and explain away a position no one has taken.

Go off the facts not assumptions based on speculation.
Reply

Posted: Jun 24th 2011 12:21AM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
You seem to be holding on to me as I spin. You first say that there is nothing good from this news and that it's depressing. Now you're saying otherwise while acting like I'm the spinster. Okay then =)

I have no idea where you think I come off as overly defensive but whatever (truly since you seem hell bent on arguing over every little detail, existent or not. Uh oh, was that defensive? =O...Nah =P). Like I said, time will tell and you're taking a comment far too seriously. Not that I was joking but it's not like I'm reporting anything or writing an academic paper on a very simple opinion.

Are you one of those rabid fans I speak of?

Anyhow, I'm done having fun with you on this topic since, again, there's no argument to be had. It's all postulations. Perhaps you're in a debating mood but I have no interest in going in circles with you, even while we're giggling hysterically.

Meet me up on a more serious matter and we'll be sure to have a fun debate, should we not meet eye to eye on that future subject. And no, I'm no avoiding anything I just spent more time on this simple comment that I ever intended to and it doesn't matter to me. If I'm wrong nothing changes because it was just an opinion. If I'm right, in my original assertion, we all win.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:24PM DarkSan00 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No shit.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:24PM Epoque said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Really hope they do another 'Smash Bros. DOJO' to follow the development. That was a lot of fun.

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:32PM cantwait2bhome said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Epoque
Yeah! I really loved the constant reveals of new characters and items.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:35PM Xiegfried said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Epoque

The Dojo was the highlight of my mornings for a while. It was so awesome to wake up to new characters and stages along with the occasional mechanics posts.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:54PM Ospov said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Epoque

The dojo was awesome. That was my favorite part of the day back when it updated every morning.
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:30PM gatotsu911 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, no surprise here. Iwata said the haven't even entered development yet - they don't even have a title and logo! How long after its initial announcement did Brawl come out?

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:34PM dagamer34 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yep, coming to U in Fall 2015!

Posted: Jun 23rd 2011 12:37PM ColorblindMonk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's understandable, as you can't rush not only one game of a highly respected series, but two simultaneously.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW