| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (58)

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:06AM Rizraz said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
All i want to know is when its coming out!
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:15AM Peril said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Rizraz Knowing Blizzard.....4 years
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:23AM Robborboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rizraz I'm more interested to see if the apparent rumors of a console version will pan out. Especially after the amazing success of Torchlight 360.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 10:29AM maxxgold said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Peril

Nooooooooooooo
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 2:40PM warhammer18 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Rizraz November 15th the end begins
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:13AM Cleaver said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
BLIZZARD! How much longer will you be making me wait?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 11:41AM MrAlex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Cleaver

You'll get to play it on your deathbed
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:16AM Tradio said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
hmmm has all the makings of a fine console port....coming to an xbox 360 and ps3 soon....
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:33AM Electrium said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tradio I dunno about that "soon" part, but I think you're right!

http://www.joystiq.com/2011/02/10/blizzard-investigating-diablo-for-consoles/
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 7:38AM BigBadBob113 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tradio That's what I've been hoping for since it was first announced
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:39AM Kimchi Kommando said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tradio

Atleast the PS3, it can use USB keyboards for crying out loud!!
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:23AM qwertified said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
THE hack & slash RPG i've been waiting for since the last of my high school days.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 11:39AM JessMeNU said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@qwertified Born in the early or mid 80s?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:37AM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:40AM The Blank Mage Returns said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@The Blank Mage Returns

With that out of the way, I like to hear that we're going back to a meteor-stricken Tristram. Honestly, what else can happen to that (literally) damned town? Oh, wait! Can we kill Griswald? Again? That would just make my day.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 4:23AM Titus8705 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@The Blank Mage Returns I want Wirt to be revived, so I finally get a chance to murder that little jerk. Oh, and then take his leg.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2011 8:06AM Grimbear13 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@The Blank Mage Returns
Couldnt agree more! I played this last year at Blizzcon and have been dying to get my hands on it again. I'm intreagued to hear a bit of the story it's exciting. I can't wait to see what new/old chars will be back in it (both alive and re-deaded). Also pretty cool to see that the SkeleKing is in fact King Leoric. When I first saw him I wasn't sure if that's who it was (I mean he is a ressurected skeleton...there's no reason he couldn't come back). I wonder if there's another member of the Butcher family in this game since we've killed him and his two brothers, that smith guy in D2 Act 1 and Hephaestus in A4. Whatever I wish this would be done already easily my most anticipated game of the past 4 years.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:45AM Dubiousity said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I barely even remember playing Diablo 2, couldn't have been older than 10.

SO WHY DO I WANT THIS SO BAD?!
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 8:57AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dubiousity - I don't think I was much older. Still though, I played the hell out of it, and I loved it dearly.

(I was even younger for D1. Not sure how I got the game, as my parents never would have allowed me to buy it)
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:50AM JoeBruin said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Wow, a way to sell items from the field and an account wide stash! Good job Torchlight :P
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 3:54AM DevilSei said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"That's not to say that there won't be rare crafting materials, but the actual produced items are meant to be random, not substitutes for dropped gear."

If Crafted gear is not meant to be a substitute for dropped gear, what's the point then in bothering to turn all those drops into materials when its just better to convert it to gold?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:44AM Suichimo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@DevilSei

Scarcity, probably.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:48AM 2late2die said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@DevilSei I'm assuming a lucky drop will always be better than what you can buy (with maybe a few special item exceptions) so the idea is I guess to try your luck a few more times. Besides, you can still probably sell the generated items. At a loss sure but that's the idea - you roll the dice and maybe you get lucky and score a great item or you end up with some duds and make a few gold coins.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 11:17AM radioactivez0r said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@DevilSei I think what the phrase meant was "it won't fill in OK until you find something actually good", but instead it can be something just as good as a drop.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 6:53PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@2late2die

Yeah. This is just an assumption, but I wouldn't be surprised if this crafting system is sort of a fleshed out replacement for the gambling vendors in D2.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 4:08AM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How uhh...how does a man get into this beta? .....I need it....other Alpha I was in ends today....

;_;
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 4:11AM Torticoli said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'm afraid this real-money crap at the AH is enough to disgust me from this game, the same way I've been disgusted from WoW. I guess we'll see, but Blizzard has become extremely arrogant and greedy recently. I personally don't want to support that kind of attitude.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 7:59AM Apakal said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Torticoli

Diablo PvP was already an unbalanced nightmare. This only makes it worse. I'm with you on this.

I won't be playing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:25AM Wulf said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Torticoli

So it's better to let companies such as anything that comes up when you google 'diablo 2 items' continue to make money off of Blizzard's IP and scam players, rather than providing a moderated and legitimate place to do something people are going to do anyway?

...and if your retort is that 'no one buys items', tell me why these item selling sites are still doing brisk business, 11 years after the game was launched.

Brilliant stance. Just brilliant.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:37AM Torticoli said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Wulf

Yes indeed. It's better. Fight those companies, don't sink to their level.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:46AM Suichimo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Torticoli

Play Hardcore. The real money auction house isn't in that.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 10:36AM Wulf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Torticoli

This /is/ fighting those companies...

It's strangling them out of business.

If Blizzard didn't implement this, they would.

Trying to shut down these gold and item-selling sites is like trying to take out an ant colony with an icepick. There will always be more that pop up. Most are outside US juridiction and cannot have action brought against them. There is nothing Blizzard can do to shut them all down.

...save for this.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 10:59AM Torticoli said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Wulf

That's a good point. My point about not sinking to their level still holds, however. In a way, it's kind of sort of like the "should the State sell drugs to junkies ?" debate : that market shouldn't exist, but since we can't physically shut it down, we have to take it in our own hands in order to secure it and protect the consumers. That argument has its place, for sure. But it's still a paradox.

And more to the point, let's face this : we're talking about Blizzard. We're talking about a company that is selling in-game mounts in WoW for 25$, and in-game pets for 10$. The company that'll soon launch a paying "premium service" *within* its subscription-based game, allowing easier access to your friends on other servers. And Blizzard will take a portion of every transaction on this AH thing. This, as everything else they do, has now money as its primarily and final purpose, I don't have the slightest doubt about that ; "We don't plan to put items to sale ourselves with this system", they say, and I don't believe them for a second. They've been lying too much in the past few years, promising they would never do certain things, and then doing them anyway.

As I said, they've become surprisingly moneygrubbing, and they get away with it because their playerbase has issues of its own. It's still not a behaviour I want to support.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 1:08PM Svafa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Torticoli

As a single player game I have no issue with it. If someone wants to spend a few dollars to advance their game, then what do I care? It has no effect on my game. This isn't WoW or any other mmo, and it shouldn't be approached in that manner. I mean, is it unfair that I have DLC for Dragon Age or the Sims while others do not? And the areas it would really matter, like hardcore mode, won't have access to the cash auction. So, no big deal in my opinion. I likely wouldn't use it, but no harm in letting others do so.

What's more than likely to keep me from purchasing the game is the "always online" requirement. It's a single-player game, I shouldn't have to be online all the time to play. Only time will tell if that's enough to keep me away. :/
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 4:12AM Cleric said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Real money AH And always on DRM. Lol no thanks
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 11:17AM chargen said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Cleric
Cash shop, always on DRM, and open hostility towards mods. HOORAY FOR ACTIVISION
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 7:34AM b4dmash said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope they'll release atleast this game in India. ActiBlizz hasn't been doing that for pc titles lately.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:08AM Slomoshun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you think Diablo 3 will be a console port you really haven't been reading the updates and forums for the game have you?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:29AM isotrex said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Me likey and can't waitey.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 9:51AM Khalus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm banking on Blizzard announcing a release date at Blizzcon this year, for an early 2012 launch...sometime in February I'd gather...
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 10:58AM ceph3us said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 1:33PM Peffse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ceph3us
I wonder why nobody cares about this?
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2011 2:06PM monkeyontherun4 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ceph3us
yea i would say thats a BIG thing. Screw that being online the ENTIRE time. and they think there are other games to play when you don't have internet. SCREW YOU BLIZZARD
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 12:31PM Platapus said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Cracks me up. People are so angry about a real-money system they DON'T HAVE TO USE.
Anyways, I think the game itself looks freaking awesome. I can't wait to play it.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 1:23PM peter pham said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i cant wait :) its gunna be so cool
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 2:36PM iceveiled said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kinda bummed about no talent trees - I do like playing around with specs and adding points every level, but I'm sure the game will be fine without.

Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 2:42PM Vandell said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blizzard, I am disappoint.

Always-on DRM? REALLY?
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 5:21PM WeRequireMOARMinerals said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Vandell They did this with StarCraft 2. That's their rule now. You can be sure every one of their games will do this now.

I'll probably wait for the inevitable battlechest, and some hack/crack to have it working offline. If they still have my interest by then, of course, because since the release of StarCraft 2, it's been disappearing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 7:01PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@WeRequireMOARMinerals

Starcraft only requires a connection for starting new campaigns. Once you've set it up, you can play the game offline.

Even that would be excessive in a Diablo game, though. Of course I'm going to play alts, and of course I'm going to attempt to play on a laptop that may be out of wifi range, at some point.

I hope Blizzard see the error in this long before launch.
Reply

Posted: Aug 1st 2011 7:06PM Chareth Cutestory said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Chareth Cutestory

Oh, also, if you play as a "Guest" in SC2, you don't need a connection at all. The only downside is that none of your progress will be tied to your Battle.net account, so no cheevos.

I don't want separate guest and account based character lists in D3, though, especially with a supposed "account wide" stash.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW