| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 12:29AM Dan50 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This won't be good for Yee who is running for Mayor. LAWLS

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 2:48AM jsowers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder what laws our generation will try to pass to ruin the fun of our progeny.

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 3:24AM NecroSen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@jsowers
Or what legislation we'll enact to "save the children" which ends up wasting $1.4 million in taxpayer money during a time of economic recession.
Reply

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 11:04AM Dreamscape said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can't I sue the state for wasting my tax dollars on this? We already have some of the most corrupt local governments in the union. ( Google "Bell California Scandal") They're already mismanaging every single aspect of our government, then wasting millions that could've been used in schools, to improve our highways, to build that new bullet train from SF to LA, but no.


They sue videogames instead because it's "a good idea' and then I have to foot the bill for it? Days like this make me really annoyed to be an American.

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 11:37AM Nanashi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dreamscape

We really should be able to do this... Damn Eleventh Amendment , stopping me from recovering from all these frivolous expenditures my tax dollars are being used for.
Reply

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 6:59PM twocows said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nanashi
The 11th Amendment doesn't mention anything about citizens suing their own state, only other states. Later rulings citing the original constitution gave states immunity against their own citizens.
Reply

Posted: Oct 4th 2011 8:44PM Nanashi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you really want to be technical about it, yeah. But the later rulings you're talking about (Hans v. Louisiana?) essentially established that the framework of the Constitution (with regards to the Eleventh Amendment) implied that states were protected in suits from their own citizens, because it would be preposterous for this assumption not to be made. And the whole reason the amendment wasn't specifically stated to include protection from a state's own citizens is because it was unfathomable that a citizen would have sued their own state in the founding fathers' days.

Of course, you're probably a lawyer or law student, whereas I just have a penchant for browsing Findlaw and the law articles on Wikipedia, so forgive me if I'm completely misinterpreting.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW