| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (85)

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:08PM ItsameMatt03 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Conspiracy! Bias!

Activision must have paid all of these sites!

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:25PM rapidshot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ItsameMatt03 or people enjoyed it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:27PM Schlecht said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ItsameMatt03 Just like they paid DICE to make sure their servers didn't work around release. Those cunning bastards!
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:28PM NaeemTHM said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ItsameMatt03

They didn't pay Gamespot enough!
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:21PM Juneau888 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ItsameMatt03 Compare the metacritic score of 90/100 to the user score of 2.3/10. Seems like the vast majority of people agree with you mate!
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:43PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Juneau888

That's just BF fanboys and anti-FPS hipsters.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 9:41PM ScruffyTheJanitor said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Vidikron
It happens on IMDB so it's entirely plausible it could happen to a video-game too. Haters gonna hate as per.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 10:46PM LeonX84 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ItsameMatt03

I just spent all day playing MW3 and I gotta say it's a little disappointing... I did however like the survival mode which I guess you can call it something new. Multiplayer is terrible... Shotguns and grenades are nerf and sniper rifles are overpowered and quick scope is seriously an issue. Even tho they said their multiplayer maps will have less choke points, I beg to differ... If you're new to a map, well you'll be the only ones that are running around like a chicken with his head cut off while the rest are camping. Perks are also broken IMO... Good thing I didn't bight it, instead i borrowed a friend's instead and saved myself $60 :)
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 3:38AM Juneau888 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Vidikron I would agree with you however, the majority of user reviews are more pissed that when they bought a "New" game, all they got was a £50 map pack.

Me personally, I have no idea how a game that doesn't change throughout it's series can still score so highly on metacritic reviews. Any other game and i'm sure it would be the main complaint from reviewers. However, it's not so all I see from reviews atm is
"BESTEST GAME EVVEERRR!" >_
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 11:13AM Vidikron said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Juneau888

No, it's still obviously largely non-CD players. "It's the same game" is the standard argument used by all anti-CoD people even if they haven't touched the game. Don't be fooled into thinking all those people have actually bought and then reviewed the game. I guarantee you most have not.
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 12:51PM thenutman69321 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Vidikron
I'm a huge CoD fan and have bought every one of them. The past 3 or 4 are all the same game with slightly changed graphics. The same good game but still the same game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:09PM ReadingRambo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 8:34PM Warlock234 said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@ReadingRambo
So it's one building they reused for an Easter Egg type thing... what a big deal. I have three words for this-Back to Karkand.
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 1:54AM Mattjm991 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ReadingRambo
So your saying a game sucks if the designer use level assets from their other games?
Well I guess every game Valve has made sucks with that reasoning. This is a common practice used in many games. At least the building was textured differently.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:13PM Special Agent Bob said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I never thought I'd see the day when I agree with eurogamer.

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:20PM KindaOdd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Special Agent Bob
Right?
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:35PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Special Agent Bob
I never thought I'd see the day when I agreed with you, Bob.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:57PM A Sandwich said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Special Agent Bob

Most Eurogamers Reviews:

"How dare they give this game less than a 10/10!? All they do is buck trends for the sake of bucking trends! Dirty, average-score-lowering hipsters douchebags!

Eurogamer's MW3 Review:

"In the savage, lawless wilds of bought and paid for video game journalism, Eurogamer is the light!"
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 8:42PM Zolbrod said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Special Agent Bob I find they score/criticize games in a fair way pretty consistently, actually.

Uncharted 3 got an 8 too, which it deserves much more than a 10, or even a 9, being as unbalanced as it is.

Arkham City got a 9, though, as did Xenoblade.
Both games are MUCH better than BF3, UC3 and COD3 as far as I'm concerned too.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:14PM SmashZilla said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
Another year for me to begrudgingly invest far too much time into this game/series. Thank god I can skip the story mode.

Well, I guess I can't complain about 60fps, near seamless online experience. Spec Ops looks cool too.

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:21PM gold163 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SmashZilla Begrudgingly? If you don't like the game, don't play it. :/
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:35PM SmashZilla said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@gold163

It's like crack though. I want to quit but I just need one more hit of Prestige.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:38PM SKYRIM111111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@gold163

begrudgingly still addicted. doesn't sound like he hates the game
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:38PM SKYRIM111111 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@SmashZilla

lmao ikr
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:16PM BrianH said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:22PM Jetleo1 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@BrianH Caught them in the act!
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 10:54PM Warlock234 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@BrianH
Everybody knows it runs the same engine...
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 12:51AM WiredKnight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@BrianH

Not sure what you're trying to prove here...that this is the first time you've played MW3 on that computer? What else would it base it on besides the previous version?
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 1:45AM NoodleGunshot said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:18PM King Johngie the Fourth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'll admit, multiplayer feels disappointingly similar to MW2, but so far it seems to be way more balanced, making for a very enjoyable experience.

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:19PM DekuTree said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If it's only great as a CoD game, shouldn't it get its own rating scale? Not 4.5 stars compared to non CoD games?

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:27PM Doctor Who said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DekuTree

I'm gonna have to agree with you on that. The current system means that MW3 and Deus Ex: Human Revolution have about the same score. I think we can all see though which game is clearly superior, but because most COD game reviews just rate the game in comparison to the last COD, the score isn't an accurate reflection of how this game stacks up to others in the industry. Its aggravating!
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:28PM KIRBY SMASH said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DekuTree the deku tree is wise
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:31PM Roflrex said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DekuTree The scores are just an arbitrary scale to show whether the reviewer thinks the game is worth getting or not. Read the actual reviews and the rating is meaningless. That way you will be able to differentiate the different between Deus Ex and Modern Brofare 3.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:32PM Omenege said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Doctor Who

It's just a number. Honestly you make a good argument why reviews shouldn't have scores at all.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:59PM Altrix said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Doctor Who
I enjoy CoD games just as much as Deus Ex games. Maybe you don't, but your opinion is less universal.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:15PM Doctor Who said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Altrix

I'm not saying I don't enjoy both equally, but Deus Ex: Human Revolution was a better game. It brought more to the medium both in storytelling, game play, and design. Modern Warfare 3, though it does make slight changes to the general CoD formula, is still basically the same game we've been playing for the last 5 years. It doesn't really make sense why they'd be put on the same scale of rating.

Personally, I like to see a rating scale that shows the impact a game makes as a whole on a medium. Maybe I'm the odd one out, but I feel this impact should be held to a higher level of importance in the industry than it is. Might just be me though
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:48PM Vidikron said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Doctor Who

That's kind of silly though as it implies you must be innovative to get a good score. I see people use that line of thought all the time but it's horrendously faulty as it means a good formula must be changed or discarded for the next game. It's change for the sake of change. While I think innovation is necessary for the overall health of the industry, there's nothing wrong with a game doing what it does best when people enjoy it.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 8:03PM Doctor Who said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Vidikron

Hmmm, you make a valid point. Looking back on it, my argument does seem quiet silly. Haha, I guess my hate for anything Activision is just making me a little butt hurt that its getting such good scores. XD
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 9:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Vidikron
See, I agree with most of what you're saying, but I also think you're at least starting to run into an issue when 3 out of 4 reviews talk about the next game. Half of the discussion is on past iterations, or what people expected but didn't get and are therefore hoping for next time. From just glancing at this metareview, it seems like people are saying "It's not what you'd dream of, but it's still a lot of fun" and I think people aren't as concerned as they should be with the distinction between "good" and "good enough." Is it worthwhile or compelling for any reason other than that it's new?

That's what I think the core of this is, and not necessarily what people are always talking about.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:30PM McPo said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"If you're expecting a huge departure"

Yeah right.........

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:31PM DavieD123 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"This looks like the same as all other COD's"... *End up still buying it*... *Rave reviews*... "Why all the COD bashing guys?"... *Glitches/overpowered weapons discovered*... "Multiplayer is an unbalanced mess, I'm never buying COD again"... Rinse and repeat.

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:24PM Jetleo1 said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@DavieD123 Good thing I found the hidden step:
*Discovers Garrysmod MW2 weapon pack*
*Plays Gmod and ignores CoD*
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:33PM SkizzNutt509 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
for me the difference between mw3 multiplayer and bf3, is that i actually feel guilty in bf when i walk away from the game during a match and leave my team to fend for themselves while a smoke a cig, or grab some dinner. It just doesn't really matter in mw3.

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:57PM SKYRIM111111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SkizzNutt509

that's because bf3 is more squad based than mw3.

mw3 repeats the same kind of game play because it works. its incredibly addictive. but sense they don't have squads you don't feel so bad when you quit mid game.

if they gave it squads it would be so addictive we would lose 10% of the population to cod.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:46PM SkizzNutt509 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SKYRIM111111 haha i disagree good sir. i honestly think it would ruin their twitchy arcade shooter feel, which is what people want. Fast paced means the rewards come faster. Gaming is a simple reward system, you do good, you get reward.... more or less but you get what i'm saying. mw is all about pace i think
Reply

Posted: Nov 9th 2011 1:25PM GreenLight said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SkizzNutt509 I'm a proud camper and a fan of both games. That being said, it's much easier to walk away and drop a mid-game deuce while playing BF3, than it is in MW3. Modern Warfare is much too fast-paced and the maps are smaller, making it easier to get caught and shot (with your pants down). with Battlefield 3, I can comfortably drop a deuce, grab another beer, and get back to the sticks without anyone even noticing, because the maps are so damn huge. Your comment is fanboy-ish and I projectile vomit in it's general direction. Long live both games.
Reply

Posted: Nov 10th 2011 4:50PM SkizzNutt509 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@GreenLight It's great how you got all childish at the end of your comment. No fanboyism here broham just how i feel. You don't need to insult somebody to get your point across. I understand what you're saying but i disagree, i think that my team would need me more while i'm smoking during bf3. Actually i know they would, cause it's team based gameplay. Mw3 is good for hanging with friend and killing people at a fast pace. It's all about k/d ratio in mw. I will gladly take bullets and be a meat shield for my teamate if it's for the objective and expect them to do the same in bf3. In mw not so much. People are too worried about their own personal ratio and streaks, but that's how the game is built and that's completely fine.
Reply

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 6:40PM SisypheanLife said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I would call CoD multiplayer a lot of things, but I certainly wouldn't call it "extremely deep", as Game Trailers did.

Posted: Nov 8th 2011 7:58PM DeadpooI said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@SisypheanLife
Yeah but this is GameTrailers we're talking about.

"The PS3 is more powerful than any PC out there today."
"Uncharted 2 got a 9.3 because it's not original, it does nothing new - AND THE GAME OF THE YEAR IS MODERN WARFARE 2!"
Reply

Featured Stories

Image

Stiq Figures, May 14 - 20: He's heating up edition

Posted on May 27th 2012 11:30PM

Image

The Joystiq Indie Pitch: Ballin

Posted on May 27th 2012 10:30PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW