| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (67)

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well, one good thing, the house NEVER comes to a consensus...

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:13PM SamE said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:53PM Code Supreme commenter said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@SamE I'm so glad Joystiq doesn't allow embedding images. Such a lazy way to not give an opinion and a desperate attempt to get blue'd.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:07PM Roxas560 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
is this a win or a loss, cuz it still sounds like it is going to happen.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:13PM Faceless Troll said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Roxas560

It's not a win until SOPA gets buried.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:00PM Jetleo1 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Faceless Troll Buried isn't enough, it needs to be burned alive, have the ashes buried on Mars, send Mars through the portal from Doom into Hell, and then nuke it while it's there.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:03PM pluupy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Jetleo1
Hey! Don't send it to Doom! That's a good game!
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:56PM Code Supreme commenter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jetleo1 Don't you mean:

"Buried isn't enough, it needs to be burned alive, have the ashes buried on (CENSORED), send (CENSORED) through the portal from (CENSORED!!!) into (CENSORED), and then nuke it while it's there. "
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 9:17PM Mcmax3000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Roxas560 - It's a win of the battle but the war continues. The SOPA supporters are going to regroup and make changes and try to get it (or a new, similar bill) pushed though again at a later date.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"In an unusually blunt statement, Obama administration officials signaled that the White House would not support parts of two bills wending their way through Congress -- the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA) that critics say would limit freedom of speech on the Internet and unfairly punish legitimate websites."

EH!?

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:07PM Faceless Troll said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified) If the indefinite detention fiasco was anything to go by that probably means he'll wind up signing it anyway.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:49PM hami83 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Faceless Troll After that defense act, I wouldn't be surprised if it comes back with nothing changed and he signs it saying he wishes he didn't have to or something stupid.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:24PM bm111 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought that the NDAA was required to get the military their yearly budget? As in... if he didn't sign it, the army would have had no money this year. What do you expect him to do? Most he could do was pledge not to enforce the bad part of the bill, which he did.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:18PM Tradio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
they will pass this but not Net Neutrality?

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:29PM doodles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tradio
SOPA and Net Neutrality are both designed to look like they stop "evil" things, but the true reason for these are control. Plain and simple.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 7:05PM libregkd said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@doodles
What? Net Neutrality is like, the exact opposite of what SOPA wants to do. Net Neutrality means that there should be NO restrictions put on the internet, be it from internet providers, governments, big business, etc.

Net Neutrality isn't about control at all, its the exact opposite of that.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2012 4:02AM maxwell97 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@libregkd No, actually it is control. It's the Internet version of rent control - people who provide nothing telling those who provide something how to do it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:21PM Ryuk said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 6:01PM Code Supreme commenter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ryuk Way to add to the discussion.

And molotovzav, just because YOU have access to cheap high-speed bandwidth doesn't mean EVERYONE does. Everyone's pleased as punch with digital downloads until they realize it's an even easier way for these companies to exert control over your purchases. Or until their HDD crashes.

Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:28PM HighFiveJesus said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
There's no possible way that the house and congress could have any lower of an approval rating.

Then they come up with THIS.

Well played.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 6:03PM Code Supreme commenter said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@HighFiveJesus To be fair, I doubt the general population even knows what SOPA is or how dangerous it is. I think they might be a little pre-occupied with things like unemployment and medicare.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:34PM Halgrimur said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Hey, Joystiq, just out of interest,
since you (and your parent company) opposes SOPA, are you joining in with the Jan 18th virtual protest?

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:44PM drunkingamebar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Halgrimur - I hope they do.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:36PM Teeree said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Fightforthefuture.org is asking people to petition sites for January 18, when sites like Mozilla and Reddit are going dark as a protest against SOPA and PIPA. People are petitioning for Google, Facebook, and other huge ones. Maybe Joystiq should join in.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:04PM pluupy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Teeree
No, not just Joystiq. Joystiq is too small.

It must be AOL.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 6:04PM Code Supreme commenter said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Teeree Forget all other companies. If only Facebook and Google participated, you'd better believe EVERYONE will take notice.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2012 12:40AM Blay said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Teeree
Nah google doesn't need to shut down for a day, what they need to do is have every search no matter what you type return the same few results anti sopa petitions, contact us pages for congressmen ect.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2012 4:21PM clapperdude said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Blay Heh yea thatd be good -- or maybe like everything returns a blocked/access denied page with an explanation on why thats what the future might hold.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:38PM LaughingTarget said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Consensus - the process by which government officials come to an agreement on how to screw everyone over.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:59PM Halgrimur said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@LaughingTarget
I really like what Legion said about about consensus- something about how the geth actually build it and humans impose it on others.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 3:55PM thecoon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone think this will actually pass?

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:04PM arucious said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@thecoon
I mean have you taken a look t the givernment and th people in it....
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I'm still not sure what gives american's the right to institute a law that affects the whole world. And if you think of it really, these companies always complain that they are losing millions, but all north americans consume to the fullest (and beyond with credit cards), so what are they really losing? It's not like people will magically have more money to buy absolutely everything legally once they can no longer pirate. If I pirate a Warner records CD because I can't afford it after buying a Warner movie, the only person losing is no one because I wouldn't have had the money for the cd anyway. So they argue that I'm simply not allowed to have the cd. But didn't they price gouge on their media in the first place? $40 for a new release blu-ray is hardly fair. Re-releasing a movie I just purchased as a directors cut with content I thought it included the 1st time around is hardly fair. SO where's our "Protect Consumers from Corporate Greed Act" to balance out whatever they limit with SOPA?

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:09PM gettinmoney662 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

You don't get to have whatever you want if you can't afford it, regardless of your justifications. If you only have money for a CD or a movie, you choose one and skip the other. Welcome to being an adult.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 6:56PM Esposch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

Wait.
Expecting a return on your investment is considered greedy, because the person expecting the return has a lot of money to begin with.
Yet taking a luxury item you can't afford without paying a cent is totally OK, because the person taking the crap they don't really need can't afford this crap?

Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 9:29PM JakeAuditore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified) While I may not agree with how some big businesses are run, you have to think about the consequences of putting limitations on them. You start telling privately owned businesses (big or small) how they should be run, and trust the GOVERNMENT to do this, then those businesses start exporting jobs to China, India, etc., and America would fall apart even more.

Big business is not inherently evil, they keep our economy afloat.

/pointless rant
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2012 4:07AM maxwell97 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@JakeAuditore Well said.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:05PM Dynamite Jack said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Republican Darrell Issa is my district's congressman and it's nice to see he's leading the charge against SOPA.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:06PM Esposch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bills in America have to pass through both Houses, right? So if SOPA fails in the House of Reps, then there's no way PIPA would either.

Posted: Jan 15th 2012 7:28PM MAINEiac4434 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Esposch Right. But PIPA is being filibustered by (awesome) Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, so the Senate won't even have a chance to bring up the bill for a vote.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:07PM TraceurRyuk Part III said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"As for that Senate action, Sen. Patrick Leahy has announced that the ISP blocking component of the Senate's PIPA act will be removed through a managers' amendment"

Isn't that what everyone was worried about though?

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:36PM molotovzav said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
This has made me consider voting republican in my state now, like the rest of the Nevadans. But I can't let Harry Reid and a bunch of old people who understand little to nothing about the internet pass crap like this. They probably think trolls are truthful and go out and arrest internet trolls. Oh well once the cost of how much this will take to completely carry out, hopefully supporters will drop. The government doesn't have the time or money to do this, unless they hire a private company, and that private company, thats too crazy, I don't see that happening. And I guess who cares about trolls, they're stupid and say crazy things, Idk, i come from a libertarian state you ask any of us, "how much control should the government have of your personal life 1 being the lowest", and we say 0 everytime. I feel liberties could be sucked out overtime, maybe not right away but over time slow erosion of internet rights, it won't be extreme, but we'll miss the old days for sure.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:25PM Mujokan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@molotovzav "This has made me consider voting republican in my state now"

Hilarious.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:46PM Once known as Shadsy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@molotovzav SOPA isn't any one party's issue. It has bipartisan support. Democrat (Leahy) is spearheading PIPA in the Senate, while a Republican (Smith) is doing SOPA in the House.

Don't be fooled into thinking voting for either party is going to get their platform represented. If either party stood for their values (civil liberties for the Dems, small government for the GOP), SOPA wouldn't even be on the table.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 4:41PM molotovzav said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
They're still protecting media no one wants anyway, this is really being pushed by Music and Movies , why because they think they should still be able to cell dvds, blu rays, and cds in a digital time, they're stupid and refuse to believe they'd make more money completely digital anyway. Oh well, I can wait for every movie I want to see to just come out on hbo, and I don't even listen to new music anymore, (you get to that age right). They think if they block ways for me to get those things for free I'll shell out money for their bogus physical medium, no thanks they'll learn.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 8:49PM SmarmyJerkface said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@molotovzav Misguiding logic like yours is why we have bills like this making their way through the system.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 9:09PM s256 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@SmarmyJerkface Obsolete technology deserves to die, disruption happens, if people can't adapt they'll fail and good riddance!
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:38PM Gandkaidos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just gotta say I'm soo glad Joystiq is keeping tabs on this. Man, I'd miss all these little yet powerful details.

And if I may:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_gcA0ZuKGkI8/SxSfyNra7AI/AAAAAAAAFAs/shcC5FvyRdw/s640/government%2Bdemotivator.jpg

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:43PM Once known as Shadsy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As I expected, the bill is being taken down by restrictive procedures and a slow-moving Congress, not by petitions and protests.

Remember folks: bills aren't killed. They just linger and die in subcommittee forever.

Posted: Jan 14th 2012 5:58PM Otakkun said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just wonder who will pay for all of this? There's hardly enough money for HEALTH and we're dumping billions to "protect" CDs & Movies?
What a sad country.

Featured Stories

Image

Stiq Figures, May 14 - 20: He's heating up edition

Posted on May 27th 2012 11:30PM

Image

The Joystiq Indie Pitch: Ballin

Posted on May 27th 2012 10:30PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW